Advertisement
AHL vs CNA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHL is a Hold and CNA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CNA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AHL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CNA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while CNA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNA is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AHL | CNA | AHL / CNA | |
| Capitalization | 3.38B | 12.5B | 27% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | N/A | 3.126 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 5.41 | 12.58 | 43% |
| Revenue | 3.16B | 14.6B | 22% |
| Total Cash | 6.21B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 367M | 2.98B | 12% |
AHL | CNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNA's Valuation (23) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHL (61) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.
CNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's SMR Rating (73) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (88) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (56) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.
CNA's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
| AHL | CNA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% | 7 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 52% | 18 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 57% |
Advertisement
AHL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.