Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHLAX vs AMFNX
AHLAX vs AMFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHLAX vs. AMFNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHLAX is a Hold and AMFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHLAX has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. AMFNX (1.26B). AMFNX pays higher dividends than AHLAX: AMFNX (1.85) vs AHLAX (0.18). AHLAX was incepted earlier than AMFNX: AHLAX (11 years) vs AMFNX (8 years). AHLAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.44). AHLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: AHLAX (2500) vs AMFNX (2500000). AHLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.81 vs. AMFNX (-16.77). AHLAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.41 vs. AMFNX (-10.95).
| AHLAX | AMFNX | AHLAX / AMFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.33 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.44 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.996 | -15.789 | 51% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 1.26B | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.85 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.81 | -16.77 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.69 | -41.30 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.41 | -10.95 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.38 | N/A | - |