Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHLAX vs GFFRX
AHLAX vs GFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHLAX vs. GFFRX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHLAX is a Hold and GFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHLAX has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. GFFRX (173M). AHLAX pays higher dividends than GFFRX: AHLAX (0.17) vs GFFRX (0.00). AHLAX was incepted earlier than GFFRX: AHLAX (11 years) vs GFFRX (14 years). GFFRX (2.07) is less costly to investors than AHLAX (1.92). GFFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHLAX: GFFRX (0) vs AHLAX (2500). AHLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.78 vs. GFFRX (-1.74). AHLAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.82 vs. GFFRX (-0.10).
| AHLAX | GFFRX | AHLAX / GFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.85 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 2.07 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.012 | -1.508 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 173M | 983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.78 | -1.74 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.36 | -20.79 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.82 | -0.10 | -5,868% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.06 | 0.80 | 507% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers