Ad is loading...
AHLPX vs ASFCX
AHLPX vs ASFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHLPX vs. ASFCX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHLPX is a Hold and ASFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHLPX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. ASFCX (1.46B). ASFCX pays higher dividends than AHLPX: ASFCX (0.38) vs AHLPX (0.31). AHLPX was incepted earlier than ASFCX: AHLPX (11 years) vs ASFCX (15 years). ASFCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than AHLPX (1.86). AHLPX (2500) and ASFCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AHLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -18.53 vs. ASFCX (-27.48). AHLPX return over 5 years is better than : -8.55 vs. ASFCX (-17.13).
| AHLPX | ASFCX | AHLPX / ASFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.45 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.45 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.765 | -16.308 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 1.46B | 176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.38 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.53 | -27.48 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.65 | -40.84 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.55 | -17.13 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.22 | -27.92 | 37% |