Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHLPX vs GFFRX
AHLPX vs GFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHLPX vs. GFFRX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHLPX is a Hold and GFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. GFFRX (173M). AHLPX pays higher dividends than GFFRX: AHLPX (0.31) vs GFFRX (0.00). AHLPX was incepted earlier than GFFRX: AHLPX (11 years) vs GFFRX (14 years). GFFRX (2.07) is less costly to investors than AHLPX (1.91). GFFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHLPX: GFFRX (0) vs AHLPX (2500). AHLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.91 vs. GFFRX (-1.74). AHLPX return over 5 years is better than : 5.86 vs. GFFRX (-0.10).
| AHLPX | GFFRX | AHLPX / GFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.85 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 2.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.913 | -1.508 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 173M | 983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | -1.74 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.27 | -20.79 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.86 | -0.10 | -5,905% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.00 | 0.80 | 498% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers