Ad is loading...
AHMFX vs PTCCX
AHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts AHMFX vs PTCCX
American High-Income Municipal Bond F-2
Price$14.88
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.58B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.26
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets656.74M
AHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHMFX vs. PTCCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHMFX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. PTCCX (657M). AHMFX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: AHMFX (4.23) vs PTCCX (3.16). AHMFX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: AHMFX (17 years) vs PTCCX (26 years). PTCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AHMFX (0.43). AHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHMFX: PTCCX (0) vs AHMFX (250). AHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.37 vs. PTCCX (-2.17). AHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.05 vs. PTCCX (-2.45).
| AHMFX | PTCCX | AHMFX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.71 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.71 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.485 | -3.009 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 657M | 1,918% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.23 | 3.16 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | -2.17 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.39 | -0.10 | -1,396% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.05 | -2.45 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.36 | -6.64 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...