Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHMFX vs PTCCX
AHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts AHMFX vs PTCCX
American High-Income Municipal Bond F-2
Price$15.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.53B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets608.79M
AHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHMFX vs. PTCCX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHMFX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. PTCCX (609M). AHMFX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: AHMFX (4.37) vs PTCCX (3.42). AHMFX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: AHMFX (17 years) vs PTCCX (27 years). PTCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AHMFX (0.43). AHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHMFX: PTCCX (0) vs AHMFX (250). AHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.02 vs. PTCCX (-2.85). AHMFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.76 vs. PTCCX (-8.42).
| AHMFX | PTCCX | AHMFX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.71 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.71 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.589 | -0.673 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 609M | 2,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 3.42 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.02 | -2.85 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.92 | 3.68 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.76 | -8.42 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.20 | -3.55 | -118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers