Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHMFX vs PTFRX
AHMFX vs PTFRX Comparison
Open Charts AHMFX vs PTFRX
American High-Income Municipal Bond F-2
Price$14.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.78B
Putnam Tax Free High Yield R6
Price$11.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets639.13M
AHMFX vs PTFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHMFX vs. PTFRX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHMFX is a Hold and PTFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. PTFRX (639M). PTFRX (4.28) and AHMFX (4.27) have matching dividends . AHMFX was incepted earlier than PTFRX: AHMFX (17 years) vs PTFRX (7 years). PTFRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than AHMFX (0.43). AHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTFRX (25.00). PTFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHMFX: PTFRX (0) vs AHMFX (250). AHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.88 vs. PTFRX (-3.98). AHMFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.30 vs. PTFRX (-8.10).
| AHMFX | PTFRX | AHMFX / PTFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.69 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.69 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.681 | -3.403 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 639M | 2,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 4.28 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.88 | -3.98 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.94 | 0.11 | 1,777% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.30 | -8.10 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement