Ad is loading...
AHMFX vs PTFRX
AHMFX vs PTFRX Comparison
Open Charts AHMFX vs PTFRX
American High-Income Municipal Bond F-2
Price$14.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.42B
Putnam Tax Free High Yield R6
Price$11.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.4M
AHMFX vs PTFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHMFX vs. PTFRX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHMFX is a Hold and PTFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. PTFRX (632M). PTFRX (4.13) and AHMFX (4.06) have matching dividends . AHMFX was incepted earlier than PTFRX: AHMFX (17 years) vs PTFRX (7 years). PTFRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than AHMFX (0.43). AHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTFRX (25.00). PTFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHMFX: PTFRX (0) vs AHMFX (250). AHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.09 vs. PTFRX (-1.93). AHMFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.07 vs. PTFRX (-4.86).
| AHMFX | PTFRX | AHMFX / PTFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.69 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.69 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.139 | -3.863 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 632M | 1,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.06 | 4.13 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | -1.93 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.96 | -5.33 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.07 | -4.86 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...