Ad is loading...
AHSAX vs FSPHX
AHSAX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSAX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSAX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. AHSAX (67.2M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs AHSAX (0.00). AHSAX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSAX (23 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). AHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSAX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. AHSAX (-13.77). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -7.06 vs. AHSAX (-34.15).
| AHSAX | FSPHX | AHSAX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.65 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.65 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.188 | -5.798 | 227% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.2M | 6.42B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.77 | -8.31 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.56 | -9.31 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.15 | -7.06 | 484% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.54 | 8.14 | -338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers