AI
Price
$25.95
Change
+$0.61 (+2.41%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.22B
81 days until earnings call
FALC
Price
$1.28
Change
+$0.11 (+9.40%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AI vs FALC

Header iconAI vs FALC Comparison
Open Charts AI vs FALCBanner chart's image
C3ai
Price$25.95
Change+$0.61 (+2.41%)
Volume$6.03M
Capitalization3.22B
FalconStor Software
Price$1.28
Change+$0.11 (+9.40%)
Volume$401
Capitalization9.61M
AI vs FALC Comparison Chart
Loading...
AI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AI vs. FALC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AI is a Hold and FALC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AI: $25.95 vs. FALC: $1.28)
Brand notoriety: AI and FALC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AI: 109% vs. FALC: 21%
Market capitalization -- AI: $3.22B vs. FALC: $9.61M
AI [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.22B. FALC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $9.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFALC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AI is a better buy in the long-term than FALC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AI’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AI (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while FALC (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

AI is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

FALC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.60% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AI($3.22B) has a higher market cap than FALC($9.62M). AI YTD gains are higher at: -24.630 vs. FALC (-36.000). FALC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -382.26K vs. AI (-297.02M). AI has more cash in the bank: 723M vs. FALC (1.84M). FALC has less debt than AI: FALC (2.28M) vs AI (2.94M). AI has higher revenues than FALC: AI (296M) vs FALC (10.3M).
AIFALCAI / FALC
Capitalization3.22B9.62M33,510%
EBITDA-297.02M-382.26K77,701%
Gain YTD-24.630-36.00068%
P/E Ratio60.98N/A-
Revenue296M10.3M2,874%
Total Cash723M1.84M39,315%
Total Debt2.94M2.28M129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AI vs FALC: Fundamental Ratings
AI
FALC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5486
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5362
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AI's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FALC (73) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AI’s stock grew significantly faster than FALC’s over the last 12 months.

AI's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AI’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

AI's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (99) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AI’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

AI's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (86) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AI’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

AI's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (62) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that AI’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APDYX24.930.06
+0.24%
Artisan Developing World Advisor
RIDGX26.340.06
+0.23%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R6
NSMVX38.85N/A
N/A
North Star Micro Cap I
HMECX18.96N/A
N/A
NexPoint Merger Arbitrage C
DYGAX14.11N/A
N/A
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Adviser

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
+9.59%
WRDLY - FALC
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.73%
WWLNF - FALC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXM - FALC
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
CREX - FALC
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
AI - FALC
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
More