AIAGF
Price
$87.20
Change
+$1.71 (+2.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
MEC
Price
$16.10
Change
+$0.34 (+2.16%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
329.42M
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIAGF vs MEC

Header iconAIAGF vs MEC Comparison
Open Charts AIAGF vs MECBanner chart's image
Aurubis Ag
Price$87.20
Change+$1.71 (+2.00%)
Volume$3.77K
Capitalization4.8B
Mayville Engineering
Price$16.10
Change+$0.34 (+2.16%)
Volume$57.18K
Capitalization329.42M
AIAGF vs MEC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIAGF vs. MEC commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIAGF is a Hold and MEC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AIAGF: $87.20 vs. MEC: $16.10)
Brand notoriety: AIAGF and MEC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIAGF: 112% vs. MEC: 50%
Market capitalization -- AIAGF: $4.8B vs. MEC: $329.42M
AIAGF [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $4.8B. MEC’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $329.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMEC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIAGF is a better buy in the long-term than MEC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIAGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIAGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MEC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MEC is a better buy in the short-term than AIAGF.

Price Growth

AIAGF (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MEC (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MEC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+3.83% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIAGF($4.8B) has a higher market cap than MEC($329M). MEC has higher P/E ratio than AIAGF: MEC (14.91) vs AIAGF (4.66). AIAGF YTD gains are higher at: 10.365 vs. MEC (2.417). AIAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16B vs. MEC (76.3M). AIAGF has more cash in the bank: 490M vs. MEC (183K). MEC has less debt than AIAGF: MEC (107M) vs AIAGF (579M). AIAGF has higher revenues than MEC: AIAGF (18.1B) vs MEC (556M).
AIAGFMECAIAGF / MEC
Capitalization4.8B329M1,458%
EBITDA1.16B76.3M1,526%
Gain YTD10.3652.417429%
P/E Ratio4.6614.9131%
Revenue18.1B556M3,255%
Total Cash490M183K267,760%
Total Debt579M107M541%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIAGF vs MEC: Fundamental Ratings
AIAGF
MEC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5013
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4260
SMR RATING
1..100
5470
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIAGF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEC (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEC’s over the last 12 months.

AIAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MEC (60) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew similarly to MEC’s over the last 12 months.

AIAGF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MEC (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew similarly to MEC’s over the last 12 months.

MEC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AIAGF (55) in the null industry. This means that MEC’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MEC's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AIAGF (99) in the null industry. This means that MEC’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIAGFMEC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMICF65.49N/A
N/A
Trend Micro Inc.
ZUKI0.03N/A
N/A
Zuki Inc.
SOBKY14.80-0.14
-0.94%
Softbank Corp.
CDDRF5.29-0.12
-2.18%
HEADWATER EXPL INC.
CPFXF0.18-0.01
-3.24%
Copper Fox Metals Inc.

AIAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIAGF and MEC have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIAGF and MEC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIAGF
1D Price
Change %
AIAGF100%
N/A
MEC - AIAGF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
MLI - AIAGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
NWPX - AIAGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
IIIN - AIAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
TG - AIAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More

MEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEC and GFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEC and GFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEC
1D Price
Change %
MEC100%
+2.16%
GFF - MEC
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
MT - MEC
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
ZEUS - MEC
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
STLD - MEC
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
VMI - MEC
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More