AIBRF
Price
$5.61
Change
-$0.03 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.35B
BPCGF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.02 (+4.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.14B
Ad is loading...

AIBRF vs BPCGF

Header iconAIBRF vs BPCGF Comparison
Open Charts AIBRF vs BPCGFBanner chart's image
AIB Group
Price$5.61
Change-$0.03 (-0.53%)
Volume$979
Capitalization12.35B
Banco Comercial Portugues S.A
Price$0.52
Change+$0.02 (+4.00%)
Volume$35K
Capitalization4.14B
AIBRF vs BPCGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIBRF vs. BPCGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIBRF is a Hold and BPCGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AIBRF: $5.61 vs. BPCGF: $0.52)
Brand notoriety: AIBRF and BPCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIBRF: 9% vs. BPCGF: 1828%
Market capitalization -- AIBRF: $12.35B vs. BPCGF: $4.14B
AIBRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.35B. BPCGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIBRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBPCGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AIBRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BPCGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPCGF is a better buy in the long-term than AIBRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIBRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AIBRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AIBRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.76% price change this week, while BPCGF (@Regional Banks) price change was +16.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIBRF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than BPCGF($4.14B). BPCGF has higher P/E ratio than AIBRF: BPCGF (13.72) vs AIBRF (9.83). BPCGF YTD gains are higher at: 16.776 vs. AIBRF (-5.061). BPCGF has less debt than AIBRF: BPCGF (4.54B) vs AIBRF (8.45B). AIBRF has higher revenues than BPCGF: AIBRF (3.76B) vs BPCGF (3.37B).
AIBRFBPCGFAIBRF / BPCGF
Capitalization12.3B4.14B297%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.06116.776-30%
P/E Ratio9.8313.7272%
Revenue3.76B3.37B112%
Total Cash628MN/A-
Total Debt8.45B4.54B186%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIBRF vs BPCGF: Fundamental Ratings
AIBRF
BPCGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3815
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIBRF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BPCGF (41). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew similarly to BPCGF’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as AIBRF (38). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BPCGF (8). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew similarly to BPCGF’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as AIBRF (48). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIBRF (59). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIBRFBPCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYATX73.831.20
+1.65%
Rydex NASDAQ-100® A
PRMTX156.341.78
+1.15%
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
PIGCX24.210.11
+0.46%
Putnam International Equity C
CCAFX37.550.06
+0.16%
Calvert Mid-Cap A
SAOSX21.78-0.06
-0.27%
NAA Opportunity Fund P

AIBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIBRF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIBRF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIBRF
1D Price
Change %
AIBRF100%
-0.52%
FSDK - AIBRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRIY - AIBRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BPCGF - AIBRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
DNKEY - AIBRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
MNMB - AIBRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BPCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPCGF has been loosely correlated with MZTFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPCGF jumps, then MZTFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPCGF
1D Price
Change %
BPCGF100%
+3.23%
MZTFF - BPCGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UNBK - BPCGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IBWC - BPCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBIA - BPCGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBRF - BPCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More