AIBRF
Price
$5.61
Change
-$0.03 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.35B
FKYS
Price
$14.72
Change
+$0.62 (+4.40%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
111.32M
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIBRF vs FKYS

Header iconAIBRF vs FKYS Comparison
Open Charts AIBRF vs FKYSBanner chart's image
AIB Group
Price$5.61
Change-$0.03 (-0.53%)
Volume$979
Capitalization12.35B
First Keystone
Price$14.72
Change+$0.62 (+4.40%)
Volume$932
Capitalization111.32M
AIBRF vs FKYS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIBRF vs. FKYS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIBRF is a Hold and FKYS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AIBRF: $5.61 vs. FKYS: $14.72)
Brand notoriety: AIBRF and FKYS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIBRF: 9% vs. FKYS: 34%
Market capitalization -- AIBRF: $12.35B vs. FKYS: $111.32M
AIBRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.35B. FKYS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $111.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIBRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFKYS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIBRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FKYS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIBRF is a better buy in the long-term than FKYS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIBRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKYS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIBRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FKYS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIBRF is a better buy in the short-term than FKYS.

Price Growth

AIBRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.76% price change this week, while FKYS (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKYS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIBRF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than FKYS($111M). AIBRF has higher P/E ratio than FKYS: AIBRF (9.83) vs FKYS (9.31). FKYS YTD gains are higher at: 8.956 vs. AIBRF (-5.061). AIBRF has more cash in the bank: 628M vs. FKYS (11.3M). FKYS has less debt than AIBRF: FKYS (210M) vs AIBRF (8.45B). AIBRF has higher revenues than FKYS: AIBRF (3.76B) vs FKYS (40.2M).
AIBRFFKYSAIBRF / FKYS
Capitalization12.3B111M11,081%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.0618.956-57%
P/E Ratio9.839.31106%
Revenue3.76B40.2M9,358%
Total Cash628M11.3M5,558%
Total Debt8.45B210M4,024%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIBRF vs FKYS: Fundamental Ratings
AIBRF
FKYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5917
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKYS's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as AIBRF (33). This means that FKYS’s stock grew similarly to AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKYS (100). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FKYS (92). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

FKYS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as AIBRF (48). This means that FKYS’s stock grew similarly to AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

FKYS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIBRF (59). This means that FKYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIBRFFKYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
59%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LFGIX38.300.43
+1.14%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth I
LMTIX24.860.20
+0.81%
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity I
EVIFX11.920.07
+0.59%
Eaton Vance Balanced A
PSCJX24.550.13
+0.53%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R4
MVRRX49.070.19
+0.39%
MFS Value R2

AIBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIBRF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIBRF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIBRF
1D Price
Change %
AIBRF100%
-0.52%
FSDK - AIBRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRIY - AIBRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BPCGF - AIBRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
DNKEY - AIBRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
MNMB - AIBRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FKYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKYS and JYSKY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKYS and JYSKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKYS
1D Price
Change %
FKYS100%
+4.40%
JYSKY - FKYS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - FKYS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBRF - FKYS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
QNTO - FKYS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNFI - FKYS
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
More