AIBRF
Price
$8.02
Change
+$0.68 (+9.26%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.35B
FKYS
Price
$17.62
Change
-$0.39 (-2.17%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
111.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIBRF vs FKYS

Header iconAIBRF vs FKYS Comparison
Open Charts AIBRF vs FKYSBanner chart's image
AIB Group
Price$8.02
Change+$0.68 (+9.26%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization12.35B
First Keystone
Price$17.62
Change-$0.39 (-2.17%)
Volume$880
Capitalization111.32M
AIBRF vs FKYS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIBRF vs. FKYS commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIBRF is a StrongBuy and FKYS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AIBRF: $8.02 vs. FKYS: $17.62)
Brand notoriety: AIBRF and FKYS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIBRF: 73% vs. FKYS: 22%
Market capitalization -- AIBRF: $12.35B vs. FKYS: $111.32M
AIBRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.35B. FKYS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $111.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIBRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFKYS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIBRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FKYS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIBRF is a better buy in the long-term than FKYS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIBRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKYS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIBRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FKYS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIBRF is a better buy in the short-term than FKYS.

Price Growth

AIBRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while FKYS (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIBRF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than FKYS($111M). AIBRF has higher P/E ratio than FKYS: AIBRF (9.83) vs FKYS (9.31). AIBRF (35.618) and FKYS (35.532) have similar YTD gains . AIBRF has more cash in the bank: 628M vs. FKYS (11.3M). FKYS has less debt than AIBRF: FKYS (210M) vs AIBRF (8.45B). AIBRF has higher revenues than FKYS: AIBRF (3.76B) vs FKYS (40.2M).
AIBRFFKYSAIBRF / FKYS
Capitalization12.3B111M11,081%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.61835.532100%
P/E Ratio9.839.31106%
Revenue3.76B40.2M9,358%
Total Cash628M11.3M5,558%
Total Debt8.45B210M4,024%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIBRF vs FKYS: Fundamental Ratings
AIBRF
FKYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
778
SMR RATING
1..100
871
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2635
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIBRF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FKYS (54). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew similarly to FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FKYS (78). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKYS (71). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

FKYS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as AIBRF (49). This means that FKYS’s stock grew similarly to AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FKYS (35). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew similarly to FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIBRFFKYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEDI56.260.82
+1.48%
iShares U.S. Consumer Focused ETF
BCHP37.540.32
+0.85%
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
FDVV53.660.16
+0.30%
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
MYCM24.75N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2033 Corporate Bond ETF
BKMC103.82-0.19
-0.18%
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF

AIBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIBRF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIBRF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIBRF
1D Price
Change %
AIBRF100%
+9.12%
FSDK - AIBRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRIY - AIBRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.60%
BPCGF - AIBRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNKEY - AIBRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
MNMB - AIBRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FKYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKYS and JYSKY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKYS and JYSKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKYS
1D Price
Change %
FKYS100%
-2.17%
JYSKY - FKYS
23%
Poorly correlated
+43.08%
TDCB - FKYS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBRF - FKYS
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.12%
QNTO - FKYS
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
FNFI - FKYS
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More