AIBRF
Price
$7.78
Change
-$0.25 (-3.11%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
12.35B
FSDK
Price
$63.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIBRF vs FSDK

Header iconAIBRF vs FSDK Comparison
Open Charts AIBRF vs FSDKBanner chart's image
AIB Group
Price$7.78
Change-$0.25 (-3.11%)
Volume$685
Capitalization12.35B
First Citizens National Bank of Upper Sandusky (The) (OH)
Price$63.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
AIBRF vs FSDK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSDK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIBRF vs. FSDK commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIBRF is a Hold and FSDK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AIBRF: $7.78 vs. FSDK: $62.40)
Brand notoriety: AIBRF and FSDK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIBRF: 21% vs. FSDK: 100%
Market capitalization -- AIBRF: $12.35B vs. FSDK: $0
AIBRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.35B. FSDK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIBRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFSDK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIBRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FSDK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIBRF is a better buy in the long-term than FSDK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIBRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSDK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIBRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSDK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSDK is a better buy in the short-term than AIBRF.

Price Growth

AIBRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.49% price change this week, while FSDK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIBRF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIBRF YTD gains are higher at: 31.645 vs. FSDK (-0.935).
AIBRFFSDKAIBRF / FSDK
Capitalization12.3BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.645-0.935-3,386%
P/E Ratio9.83N/A-
Revenue3.76BN/A-
Total Cash628MN/A-
Total Debt8.45BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIBRF vs FSDK: Fundamental Ratings
AIBRF
FSDK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5849
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
7100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4273
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSDK's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as AIBRF (30). This means that FSDK’s stock grew similarly to AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSDK (100). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSDK (100). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FSDK (73). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew similarly to FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSDK (100). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIBRFFSDK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSDK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CETH16.911.70
+11.18%
21shares Core Ethereum ETF
SSXU31.560.06
+0.20%
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF
HYTR21.690.04
+0.18%
Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF
BOXX112.840.02
+0.02%
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
MMU9.95-0.01
-0.10%
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund

AIBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIBRF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIBRF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIBRF
1D Price
Change %
AIBRF100%
-3.11%
FSDK - AIBRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRIY - AIBRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
BPCGF - AIBRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNKEY - AIBRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
MNMB - AIBRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSDK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSDK has been loosely correlated with AIBRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSDK jumps, then AIBRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSDK
1D Price
Change %
FSDK100%
N/A
AIBRF - FSDK
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
DNSKF - FSDK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPCUF - FSDK
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHYY - FSDK
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
PFSB - FSDK
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More