AIBRF
Price
$7.82
Change
-$0.35 (-4.28%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.41B
FSDK
Price
$63.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIBRF vs FSDK

Header iconAIBRF vs FSDK Comparison
Open Charts AIBRF vs FSDKBanner chart's image
AIB Group
Price$7.82
Change-$0.35 (-4.28%)
Volume$4.68K
Capitalization17.41B
First Citizens National Bank of Upper Sandusky (The) (OH)
Price$63.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$245
CapitalizationN/A
AIBRF vs FSDK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSDK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIBRF vs. FSDK commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIBRF is a StrongBuy and FSDK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AIBRF: $7.82 vs. FSDK: $63.00)
Brand notoriety: AIBRF and FSDK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIBRF: 191% vs. FSDK: 57%
Market capitalization -- AIBRF: $17.41B vs. FSDK: $0
AIBRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.41B. FSDK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIBRF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFSDK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIBRF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • FSDK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIBRF is a better buy in the long-term than FSDK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIBRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSDK’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIBRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSDK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIBRF is a better buy in the short-term than FSDK.

Price Growth

AIBRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -9.70% price change this week, while FSDK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIBRF YTD gains are higher at: 32.318 vs. FSDK (0.018).
AIBRFFSDKAIBRF / FSDK
Capitalization17.4BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.3180.018179,556%
P/E Ratio7.51N/A-
Revenue4.67BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIBRF vs FSDK: Fundamental Ratings
AIBRF
FSDK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
598
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
8100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSDK's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as AIBRF (11). This means that FSDK’s stock grew similarly to AIBRF’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSDK (100). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSDK (100). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FSDK (57). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew similarly to FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

AIBRF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSDK (100). This means that AIBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSDK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIBRFFSDK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSDK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTEK36.280.34
+0.95%
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF
SEIS27.810.17
+0.60%
SEI Select Small Cap ETF
DFUV44.410.23
+0.52%
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
ECH32.550.11
+0.34%
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
CNXT36.27-0.77
-2.08%
VanEck ChiNext ETF

AIBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIBRF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIBRF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIBRF
1D Price
Change %
AIBRF100%
-4.33%
FSDK - AIBRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRIY - AIBRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
BPCGF - AIBRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNKEY - AIBRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
MNMB - AIBRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSDK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSDK has been loosely correlated with AIBRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSDK jumps, then AIBRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSDK
1D Price
Change %
FSDK100%
N/A
AIBRF - FSDK
33%
Loosely correlated
-4.33%
DNSKF - FSDK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPCUF - FSDK
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHYY - FSDK
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
PFSB - FSDK
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More