AIFLF
Price
$3.05
Change
+$1.21 (+65.76%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
RWAY
Price
$10.24
Change
-$0.20 (-1.92%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIFLF vs RWAY

Header iconAIFLF vs RWAY Comparison
Open Charts AIFLF vs RWAYBanner chart's image
Aiful
Price$3.05
Change+$1.21 (+65.76%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Runway Growth Finance
Price$10.24
Change-$0.20 (-1.92%)
Volume$751.16K
CapitalizationN/A
AIFLF vs RWAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFLF vs. RWAY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFLF is a Hold and RWAY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AIFLF: $3.05 vs. RWAY: $10.24)
Brand notoriety: AIFLF and RWAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFLF: 100% vs. RWAY: 229%
Market capitalization -- AIFLF: $1.23B vs. RWAY: $493.2M
AIFLF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.23B. RWAY’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $493.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRWAY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RWAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RWAY is a better buy in the long-term than AIFLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RWAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RWAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AIFLF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RWAY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

RWAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-3.13% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIFLF($1.23B) has a higher market cap than RWAY($493M). RWAY has higher P/E ratio than AIFLF: RWAY (11.17) vs AIFLF (7.62). AIFLF YTD gains are higher at: 65.761 vs. RWAY (-5.024). RWAY has less debt than AIFLF: RWAY (510M) vs AIFLF (547B). AIFLF has higher revenues than RWAY: AIFLF (141B) vs RWAY (55.9M).
AIFLFRWAYAIFLF / RWAY
Capitalization1.23B493M249%
EBITDA15BN/A-
Gain YTD65.761-5.024-1,309%
P/E Ratio7.6211.1768%
Revenue141B55.9M252,236%
Total Cash61.7BN/A-
Total Debt547B510M107,255%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFLFRWAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSRAX11.46N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr A
MSDUX12.52-0.22
-1.73%
Morgan Stanley Emerging Mkt ex China I
ACVDX8.18-0.18
-2.15%
American Century International Val R6
JIGIX27.25-0.66
-2.36%
JHancock International Growth R4
PZIMX14.15-0.43
-2.95%
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl

AIFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFLF and DWIS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFLF and DWIS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFLF
1D Price
Change %
AIFLF100%
N/A
DWIS - AIFLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNTG - AIFLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
ZIZTF - AIFLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+8.90%
RWAY - AIFLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
OPFI - AIFLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
More

RWAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWAY has been loosely correlated with CTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RWAY jumps, then CTOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RWAY
1D Price
Change %
RWAY100%
-1.92%
CTOS - RWAY
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.31%
BBDC - RWAY
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
OBDC - RWAY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
PRAA - RWAY
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
OCSL - RWAY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More