AIFLF
Price
$3.05
Change
+$1.21 (+65.76%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
RWAY
Price
$10.89
Change
-$0.04 (-0.37%)
Updated
Aug 15, 01:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
396.21M
76 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIFLF vs RWAY

Header iconAIFLF vs RWAY Comparison
Open Charts AIFLF vs RWAYBanner chart's image
Aiful
Price$3.05
Change+$1.21 (+65.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.53B
Runway Growth Finance
Price$10.89
Change-$0.04 (-0.37%)
Volume$400
Capitalization396.21M
AIFLF vs RWAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFLF vs. RWAY commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFLF is a Hold and RWAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFLF: $3.05 vs. RWAY: $10.94)
Brand notoriety: AIFLF and RWAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFLF: 100% vs. RWAY: 71%
Market capitalization -- AIFLF: $1.53B vs. RWAY: $396.21M
AIFLF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.53B. RWAY’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $396.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $670.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRWAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RWAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RWAY is a better buy in the long-term than AIFLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RWAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RWAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AIFLF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RWAY (@Savings Banks) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

RWAY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+2.41% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIFLF($1.53B) has a higher market cap than RWAY($396M). AIFLF has higher P/E ratio than RWAY: AIFLF (10.09) vs RWAY (5.82). RWAY YTD gains are higher at: 6.976 vs. AIFLF (0.000). RWAY has less debt than AIFLF: RWAY (492M) vs AIFLF (723B). AIFLF has higher revenues than RWAY: AIFLF (175B) vs RWAY (75.1M).
AIFLFRWAYAIFLF / RWAY
Capitalization1.53B396M386%
EBITDA28BN/A-
Gain YTD0.0006.976-
P/E Ratio10.095.82173%
Revenue175B75.1M233,023%
Total Cash51.8BN/A-
Total Debt723B492M146,951%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFLFRWAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFAAX34.82N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Focus A
IGFSX13.63N/A
N/A
VY® Morgan Stanley Global Franchise S2
NGCAX41.19N/A
N/A
Columbia Greater China A
BINSX15.31N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford International Alpha I
BTMPX18.59N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Inv P

AIFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFLF and DWIS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFLF and DWIS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFLF
1D Price
Change %
AIFLF100%
N/A
DWIS - AIFLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNTG - AIFLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIZTF - AIFLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWAY - AIFLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
OPFI - AIFLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
More

RWAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWAY has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RWAY jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RWAY
1D Price
Change %
RWAY100%
-1.08%
OBDC - RWAY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
OCSL - RWAY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
AER - RWAY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
AL - RWAY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
ENVA - RWAY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
More