Advertisement
AIG vs COR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIG is a Buy and COR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- COR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- COR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while COR (@Medical Distributors) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
AIG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
COR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.16% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
@Medical Distributors (+1.16% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
| AIG | COR | AIG / COR | |
| Capitalization | 46.2B | 56.7B | 81% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 4.02B | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.694 | 31.019 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.59 | 30.04 | 52% |
| Revenue | 27.7B | 317B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 35.9B | 2.23B | 1,608% |
| Total Debt | 9.26B | 8.24B | 112% |
AIG | COR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIG's Valuation (57) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as COR (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to COR’s over the last 12 months.
COR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AIG (7) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that COR’s stock grew similarly to AIG’s over the last 12 months.
COR's SMR Rating (12) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIG (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that COR’s stock grew significantly faster than AIG’s over the last 12 months.
AIG's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as COR (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AIG’s stock grew similarly to COR’s over the last 12 months.
COR's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AIG (38) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that COR’s stock grew similarly to AIG’s over the last 12 months.
| AIG | COR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
COR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COR has been loosely correlated with MCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COR jumps, then MCK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COR | 100% | -3.51% | ||
| MCK - COR | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| CAH - COR | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| SHTDF - COR | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OMI - COR | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| EDAP - COR | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||