AIG
Price
$76.65
Change
+$0.40 (+0.52%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
53.23B
68 days until earnings call
FIHL
Price
$14.52
Change
-$0.84 (-5.47%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.26B
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIG vs FIHL

Header iconAIG vs FIHL Comparison
Open Charts AIG vs FIHLBanner chart's image
American International Group
Price$76.65
Change+$0.40 (+0.52%)
Volume$5.94M
Capitalization53.23B
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$14.52
Change-$0.84 (-5.47%)
Volume$811.65K
Capitalization2.26B
AIG vs FIHL Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIG vs. FIHL commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIG is a Hold and FIHL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (AIG: $76.25 vs. FIHL: $15.36)
Brand notoriety: AIG: Notable vs. FIHL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIG: 122% vs. FIHL: 441%
Market capitalization -- AIG: $53.23B vs. FIHL: $2.26B
AIG [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $53.23B. FIHL’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFIHL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FIHL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIG and FIHL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIHL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FIHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIG is a better buy in the short-term than FIHL.

Price Growth

AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.20% price change this week, while FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -7.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

FIHL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.64% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIG($53.2B) has a higher market cap than FIHL($2.26B). AIG has higher P/E ratio than FIHL: AIG (15.59) vs FIHL (1.03). AIG YTD gains are higher at: 4.739 vs. FIHL (-15.279). AIG has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. FIHL (4.01B). FIHL has less debt than AIG: FIHL (448M) vs AIG (22.4B). AIG has higher revenues than FIHL: AIG (47.3B) vs FIHL (3.59B).
AIGFIHLAIG / FIHL
Capitalization53.2B2.26B2,351%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.739-15.279-31%
P/E Ratio15.591.031,510%
Revenue47.3B3.59B1,317%
Total Cash251B4.01B6,266%
Total Debt22.4B448M5,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIG: Fundamental Ratings
AIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIGFIHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDT49.510.40
+0.81%
IDT Corp
PAGP21.840.11
+0.51%
Plains GP Holdings LP
POWW1.83-0.04
-2.14%
AMMO
DKNG49.44-1.34
-2.64%
DraftKings
CARM0.46-0.02
-3.56%
Carisma Therapeutics

AIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIG has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIG jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIG
1D Price
Change %
AIG100%
+1.29%
HIG - AIG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
ORI - AIG
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
EQH - AIG
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
ACGL - AIG
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
FIHL - AIG
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.85%
More

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
-6.85%
AIG - FIHL
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
ORI - FIHL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
ARZGY - FIHL
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
SLF - FIHL
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
ACGL - FIHL
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
More