AIMLF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
DOCS
Price
$42.86
Change
-$1.55 (-3.49%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIMLF vs DOCS

Header iconAIMLF vs DOCS Comparison
Open Charts AIMLF vs DOCSBanner chart's image
AI / ML Innovations
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.22K
CapitalizationN/A
Doximity
Price$42.86
Change-$1.55 (-3.49%)
Volume$1.28M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AIMLF vs DOCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
DOCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AIMLF vs. DOCS commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMLF is a Hold and DOCS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AIMLF: $0.13 vs. DOCS: $42.86)
Brand notoriety: AIMLF and DOCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMLF: 89% vs. DOCS: 82%
Market capitalization -- AIMLF: $3.84M vs. DOCS: $4.93B
AIMLF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.84M. DOCS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDOCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DOCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DOCS is a better buy in the long-term than AIMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOCS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DOCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AIMLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +9.24% price change this week, while DOCS (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

DOCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOCS($4.93B) has a higher market cap than AIMLF($3.84M). DOCS has higher P/E ratio than AIMLF: DOCS (39.42) vs AIMLF (0.31). AIMLF YTD gains are higher at: 151.087 vs. DOCS (52.853). DOCS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 173M vs. AIMLF (-1.78M). DOCS has more cash in the bank: 710M vs. AIMLF (127K). AIMLF has less debt than DOCS: AIMLF (231K) vs DOCS (15.1M). DOCS has higher revenues than AIMLF: DOCS (468M) vs AIMLF (375K).
AIMLFDOCSAIMLF / DOCS
Capitalization3.84M4.93B0%
EBITDA-1.78M173M-1%
Gain YTD151.08752.853286%
P/E Ratio0.3139.421%
Revenue375K468M0%
Total Cash127K710M0%
Total Debt231K15.1M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIMLF: Fundamental Ratings
AIMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DOCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

AIMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIMLF and BWLKF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIMLF and BWLKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMLF
1D Price
Change %
AIMLF100%
-7.20%
BWLKF - AIMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMEO - AIMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
FOBIF - AIMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.91%
MNDY - AIMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
DOCS - AIMLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
More

DOCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOCS has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DOCS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOCS
1D Price
Change %
DOCS100%
-3.49%
COIN - DOCS
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
PUBM - DOCS
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
CLSK - DOCS
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
COMP - DOCS
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
RIOT - DOCS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More