AINSF
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.03 (-4.69%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
242.26M
BLBRF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.05 (-29.41%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AINSF vs BLBRF

Header iconAINSF vs BLBRF Comparison
Open Charts AINSF vs BLBRFBanner chart's image
Ainsworth Game Technology
Price$0.61
Change-$0.03 (-4.69%)
Volume$137.14K
Capitalization242.26M
Bloomberry Resorts
Price$0.12
Change-$0.05 (-29.41%)
Volume$47K
Capitalization1.8B
AINSF vs BLBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AINSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AINSF vs. BLBRF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AINSF is a Hold and BLBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AINSF: $0.61 vs. BLBRF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: AINSF and BLBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AINSF: 787% vs. BLBRF: 56%
Market capitalization -- AINSF: $242.26M vs. BLBRF: $1.8B
AINSF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $242.26M. BLBRF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $1.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AINSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBLBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AINSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BLBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AINSF and BLBRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AINSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AINSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

AINSF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -7.94% price change this week, while BLBRF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.08% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLBRF($1.8B) has a higher market cap than AINSF($242M). AINSF has higher P/E ratio than BLBRF: AINSF (31.85) vs BLBRF (24.15). AINSF YTD gains are higher at: 21.757 vs. BLBRF (-30.706). BLBRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.9B vs. AINSF (11.8M). BLBRF has more cash in the bank: 29.6B vs. AINSF (26.5M). AINSF has less debt than BLBRF: AINSF (60.4M) vs BLBRF (87.6B). BLBRF has higher revenues than AINSF: BLBRF (33.9B) vs AINSF (137M).
AINSFBLBRFAINSF / BLBRF
Capitalization242M1.8B13%
EBITDA11.8M11.9B0%
Gain YTD21.757-30.706-71%
P/E Ratio31.8524.15132%
Revenue137M33.9B0%
Total Cash26.5M29.6B0%
Total Debt60.4M87.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AINSF: Fundamental Ratings
AINSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AINSFBLBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AINSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCNIX52.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret I
IGEAX65.22N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Growth Equity A
TMCTX53.41N/A
N/A
Touchstone Mid Cap Z
HSZYX6.51N/A
N/A
NexPoint Climate Tech Y
TMITX11.51N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth I3

AINSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AINSF and BRRE have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AINSF and BRRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AINSF
1D Price
Change %
AINSF100%
-4.36%
BRRE - AINSF
10%
Poorly correlated
+11.10%
AGTEF - AINSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHGRF - AINSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLBRF - AINSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRVO - AINSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BLBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLBRF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLBRF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLBRF
1D Price
Change %
BLBRF100%
N/A
SKYZF - BLBRF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AINSF - BLBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
ARLUF - BLBRF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
AGTEF - BLBRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHGRF - BLBRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More