AINSF
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.03 (-4.69%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
242.26M
EHGRF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AINSF vs EHGRF

Header iconAINSF vs EHGRF Comparison
Open Charts AINSF vs EHGRFBanner chart's image
Ainsworth Game Technology
Price$0.61
Change-$0.03 (-4.69%)
Volume$137.14K
Capitalization242.26M
Star Entertainment Group
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$250
Capitalization1.07B
AINSF vs EHGRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AINSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AINSF vs. EHGRF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AINSF is a Hold and EHGRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AINSF: $0.61 vs. EHGRF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: AINSF and EHGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AINSF: 787% vs. EHGRF: 136%
Market capitalization -- AINSF: $242.26M vs. EHGRF: $1.07B
AINSF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $242.26M. EHGRF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AINSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEHGRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AINSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EHGRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AINSF is a better buy in the long-term than EHGRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AINSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHGRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AINSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • EHGRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EHGRF is a better buy in the short-term than AINSF.

Price Growth

AINSF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -7.94% price change this week, while EHGRF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.08% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EHGRF($1.08B) has a higher market cap than AINSF($242M). EHGRF has higher P/E ratio than AINSF: EHGRF (53.76) vs AINSF (31.85). AINSF YTD gains are higher at: 21.757 vs. EHGRF (-32.840). AINSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.8M vs. EHGRF (-1.17B). EHGRF has more cash in the bank: 66.1M vs. AINSF (26.5M). AINSF has less debt than EHGRF: AINSF (60.4M) vs EHGRF (1.63B). EHGRF has higher revenues than AINSF: EHGRF (1.71B) vs AINSF (137M).
AINSFEHGRFAINSF / EHGRF
Capitalization242M1.08B23%
EBITDA11.8M-1.17B-1%
Gain YTD21.757-32.840-66%
P/E Ratio31.8553.7659%
Revenue137M1.71B8%
Total Cash26.5M66.1M40%
Total Debt60.4M1.63B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AINSF vs EHGRF: Fundamental Ratings
AINSF
EHGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1426
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4490
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AINSF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EHGRF (71). This means that AINSF’s stock grew similarly to EHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

AINSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EHGRF (100). This means that AINSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

AINSF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as EHGRF (98). This means that AINSF’s stock grew similarly to EHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

AINSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EHGRF (90). This means that AINSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

EHGRF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AINSF (100). This means that EHGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AINSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AINSFEHGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AINSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCNIX52.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret I
IGEAX65.22N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Growth Equity A
TMCTX53.41N/A
N/A
Touchstone Mid Cap Z
HSZYX6.51N/A
N/A
NexPoint Climate Tech Y
TMITX11.51N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth I3

AINSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AINSF and BRRE have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AINSF and BRRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AINSF
1D Price
Change %
AINSF100%
-4.36%
BRRE - AINSF
10%
Poorly correlated
+11.10%
AGTEF - AINSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHGRF - AINSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLBRF - AINSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRVO - AINSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EHGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EHGRF and AINSF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHGRF and AINSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHGRF
1D Price
Change %
EHGRF100%
N/A
AINSF - EHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
RSI - EHGRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
GIGNF - EHGRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLXZ - EHGRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
ARLUF - EHGRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
More