Advertisement
AITUF vs AUDGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AITUF is a Hold and AUDGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AITUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAUDGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AITUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- AUDGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
AITUF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while AUDGF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.90%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+1.38% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| AITUF | AUDGF | AITUF / AUDGF | |
| Capitalization | 1.6B | 378M | 423% |
| EBITDA | 16.4B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -51.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 22.77 | 191.34 | 12% |
| Revenue | 112B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 50.4B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.61B | N/A | - |
AITUF | AUDGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AITUF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUDGF (100). This means that AITUF’s stock grew significantly faster than AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.
AUDGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as AITUF (87). This means that AUDGF’s stock grew similarly to AITUF’s over the last 12 months.
AITUF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUDGF (91). This means that AITUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.
AUDGF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as AITUF (72). This means that AUDGF’s stock grew similarly to AITUF’s over the last 12 months.
AUDGF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AITUF (56). This means that AUDGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AITUF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
AITUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AITUF and SANM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AITUF and SANM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AITUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AITUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SANM - AITUF | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
| AAIRF - AITUF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| HNHPF - AITUF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| HLRTF - AITUF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| AUDGF - AITUF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
AUDGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AUDGF and APELY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUDGF and APELY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AUDGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| APELY - AUDGF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BYDIF - AUDGF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| HLRTF - AUDGF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| BCNAY - AUDGF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AITUF - AUDGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||