Advertisement
AIZ vs CNA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIZ is a Hold and CNA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AIZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CNA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AIZ (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while CNA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
AIZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
CNA is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.26% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AIZ | CNA | AIZ / CNA | |
| Capitalization | 11.3B | 12.5B | 90% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.183 | 3.596 | 200% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.77 | 12.63 | 109% |
| Revenue | 12.3B | 14.6B | 84% |
| Total Cash | 4.04B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.08B | 2.98B | 70% |
AIZ | CNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNA's Valuation (24) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIZ (67) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIZ’s over the last 12 months.
CNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AIZ (34) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to AIZ’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's SMR Rating (86) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (89) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AIZ’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (57) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AIZ’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.
CNA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIZ (58) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIZ’s over the last 12 months.
| AIZ | CNA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 6 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CTA | 27.43 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| DUBS | 36.48 | -0.18 | -0.49% |
| Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | |||
| NNOV | 28.07 | -0.15 | -0.54% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Nov | |||
| TEKY | 37.31 | -0.36 | -0.95% |
| Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF | |||
| RSEE | 32.62 | -0.32 | -0.98% |
| Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | |||
AIZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIZ has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIZ jumps, then L could also see price increases.