AKBIF
Price
$0.71
Change
+$0.04 (+5.97%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
138.17M
XPEL
Price
$35.46
Change
-$2.29 (-6.07%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.54B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AKBIF vs XPEL

Header iconAKBIF vs XPEL Comparison
Open Charts AKBIF vs XPELBanner chart's image
Akebono Brake Industries
Price$0.71
Change+$0.04 (+5.97%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization138.17M
XPEL
Price$35.46
Change-$2.29 (-6.07%)
Volume$166.9K
Capitalization1.54B
AKBIF vs XPEL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AKBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKBIF vs. XPEL commentary
Jul 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKBIF is a Hold and XPEL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AKBIF: $0.71 vs. XPEL: $35.46)
Brand notoriety: AKBIF and XPEL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKBIF: 118% vs. XPEL: 90%
Market capitalization -- AKBIF: $138.17M vs. XPEL: $1.54B
AKBIF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $138.17M. XPEL’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXPEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AKBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XPEL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XPEL is a better buy in the long-term than AKBIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKBIF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPEL’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AKBIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • XPEL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AKBIF is a better buy in the short-term than XPEL.

Price Growth

AKBIF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XPEL (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -9.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

XPEL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.83% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XPEL($1.54B) has a higher market cap than AKBIF($138M). AKBIF has higher P/E ratio than XPEL: AKBIF (78.74) vs XPEL (29.22). AKBIF YTD gains are higher at: -7.792 vs. XPEL (-11.217). AKBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.1B vs. XPEL (76.9M). AKBIF has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. XPEL (11.6M). XPEL has less debt than AKBIF: XPEL (36.1M) vs AKBIF (51.4B). AKBIF has higher revenues than XPEL: AKBIF (148B) vs XPEL (396M).
AKBIFXPELAKBIF / XPEL
Capitalization138M1.54B9%
EBITDA12.1B76.9M15,735%
Gain YTD-7.792-11.21769%
P/E Ratio78.7429.22269%
Revenue148B396M37,374%
Total Cash28.2B11.6M243,103%
Total Debt51.4B36.1M142,382%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AKBIF vs XPEL: Fundamental Ratings
AKBIF
XPEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
10041
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
149
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XPEL's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as AKBIF (93). This means that XPEL’s stock grew similarly to AKBIF’s over the last 12 months.

XPEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as AKBIF (100). This means that XPEL’s stock grew similarly to AKBIF’s over the last 12 months.

XPEL's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AKBIF (100). This means that XPEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than AKBIF’s over the last 12 months.

XPEL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as AKBIF (78). This means that XPEL’s stock grew similarly to AKBIF’s over the last 12 months.

AKBIF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPEL (49). This means that AKBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPEL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKBIFXPEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AKBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HADUX74.04-0.23
-0.31%
Horizon Equity Premium Income Advisor
FSAAX16.58-0.08
-0.48%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A
TTISX12.97-0.08
-0.61%
Nuveen Quant Intl Sm Cap Eq Retirement
GDSRX25.08-0.39
-1.53%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R
PQUAX12.15-0.24
-1.94%
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity A

AKBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AKBIF and FURCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AKBIF and FURCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKBIF
1D Price
Change %
AKBIF100%
N/A
FURCF - AKBIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYLN - AKBIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
LAZR - AKBIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
MBLY - AKBIF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
XPEL - AKBIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-6.07%
More

XPEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPEL has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPEL jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPEL
1D Price
Change %
XPEL100%
-6.07%
VC - XPEL
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
FOXF - XPEL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
AXL - XPEL
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
BWA - XPEL
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
MGA - XPEL
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More