AKBLF
Price
$30.44
Change
-$0.08 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.9B
CVALF
Price
$1.93
Change
+$0.01 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
53.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AKBLF vs CVALF

Header iconAKBLF vs CVALF Comparison
Open Charts AKBLF vs CVALFBanner chart's image
Alk Abello AS
Price$30.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.26%)
Volume$28
Capitalization6.9B
Covalon Technologies
Price$1.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.52%)
Volume$12.43K
Capitalization53.01M
AKBLF vs CVALF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AKBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKBLF vs. CVALF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKBLF is a Hold and CVALF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AKBLF: $30.44 vs. CVALF: $1.93)
Brand notoriety: AKBLF and CVALF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKBLF: 347% vs. CVALF: 236%
Market capitalization -- AKBLF: $6.9B vs. CVALF: $53.01M
AKBLF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $6.9B. CVALF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $53.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $313.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVALF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AKBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CVALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AKBLF is a better buy in the long-term than CVALF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKBLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVALF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AKBLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CVALF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AKBLF and CVALF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AKBLF (@Biotechnology) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while CVALF (@Biotechnology) price change was +1.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +7.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+7.58% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AKBLF($6.9B) has a higher market cap than CVALF($53M). AKBLF has higher P/E ratio than CVALF: AKBLF (46.17) vs CVALF (17.50). AKBLF YTD gains are higher at: 36.197 vs. CVALF (-13.839). AKBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.55B vs. CVALF (4.73M). AKBLF has more cash in the bank: 517M vs. CVALF (18M). CVALF has less debt than AKBLF: CVALF (609K) vs AKBLF (800M). AKBLF has higher revenues than CVALF: AKBLF (5.71B) vs CVALF (33.8M).
AKBLFCVALFAKBLF / CVALF
Capitalization6.9B53M13,013%
EBITDA1.55B4.73M32,840%
Gain YTD36.197-13.839-262%
P/E Ratio46.1717.50264%
Revenue5.71B33.8M16,888%
Total Cash517M18M2,872%
Total Debt800M609K131,363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AKBLF vs CVALF: Fundamental Ratings
AKBLF
CVALF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4161
SMR RATING
1..100
4955
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVALF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as AKBLF (82). This means that CVALF’s stock grew similarly to AKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

AKBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CVALF (61). This means that AKBLF’s stock grew similarly to CVALF’s over the last 12 months.

AKBLF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CVALF (55). This means that AKBLF’s stock grew similarly to CVALF’s over the last 12 months.

AKBLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CVALF (48). This means that AKBLF’s stock grew similarly to CVALF’s over the last 12 months.

AKBLF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CVALF (92). This means that AKBLF’s stock grew similarly to CVALF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKBLFCVALF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AKBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDX23.090.11
+0.48%
Simplify High Yield ETF
LRND37.45-0.01
-0.02%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
CSRE26.45-0.08
-0.30%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF
INDL58.45-0.76
-1.28%
Direxion Daily MSCI India Bull 2x ETF
YINN46.96-0.98
-2.04%
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF

AKBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AKBLF and MNPR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AKBLF and MNPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKBLF
1D Price
Change %
AKBLF100%
N/A
MNPR - AKBLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.95%
MSCLF - AKBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
IOVA - AKBLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
SMMT - AKBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
VBIZF - AKBLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CVALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVALF and SMMT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVALF and SMMT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVALF
1D Price
Change %
CVALF100%
+0.52%
SMMT - CVALF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
GNFT - CVALF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
AKBLF - CVALF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TARA - CVALF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
MBIO - CVALF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.91%
More