AKBTY
Price
$2.89
Change
-$0.22 (-7.07%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.81B
19 days until earnings call
CZFS
Price
$57.06
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
274.26M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AKBTY vs CZFS

Header iconAKBTY vs CZFS Comparison
Open Charts AKBTY vs CZFSBanner chart's image
Akbank Turk Anonim Sirketi
Price$2.89
Change-$0.22 (-7.07%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization7.81B
Citizens Financial Services
Price$57.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$7.39K
Capitalization274.26M
AKBTY vs CZFS Comparison Chart in %
AKBTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKBTY vs. CZFS commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKBTY is a Hold and CZFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AKBTY: $2.89 vs. CZFS: $57.06)
Brand notoriety: AKBTY and CZFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKBTY: 17% vs. CZFS: 77%
Market capitalization -- AKBTY: $7.81B vs. CZFS: $274.26M
AKBTY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.81B. CZFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $274.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKBTY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCZFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AKBTY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AKBTY is a better buy in the long-term than CZFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKBTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AKBTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CZFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than AKBTY.

Price Growth

AKBTY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.25% price change this week, while CZFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

AKBTY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AKBTY($7.81B) has a higher market cap than CZFS($274M). CZFS has higher P/E ratio than AKBTY: CZFS (8.67) vs AKBTY (7.80). CZFS YTD gains are higher at: -6.655 vs. AKBTY (-21.015). CZFS has less debt than AKBTY: CZFS (313M) vs AKBTY (379B). AKBTY has higher revenues than CZFS: AKBTY (186B) vs CZFS (105M).
AKBTYCZFSAKBTY / CZFS
Capitalization7.81B274M2,850%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.015-6.655316%
P/E Ratio7.808.6790%
Revenue186B105M177,143%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt379B313M121,086%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AKBTY vs CZFS: Fundamental Ratings
AKBTY
CZFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
369
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4162
SMR RATING
1..100
144
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1964
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AKBTY (63). This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AKBTY’s over the last 12 months.

AKBTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (62). This means that AKBTY’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

AKBTY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (44). This means that AKBTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

AKBTY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (60). This means that AKBTY’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

AKBTY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (64). This means that AKBTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKBTYCZFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AKBTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLPNY7.580.38
+5.21%
Voestalpine AG
BHKLY94.430.43
+0.46%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
NKRKF6.95N/A
N/A
Nokian Tyres Plc.
CCUR2500.00N/A
N/A
CCUR Holdings, Inc.
KBLB0.09N/A
-1.22%
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

AKBTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AKBTY and TKGBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AKBTY and TKGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKBTY
1D Price
Change %
AKBTY100%
-7.07%
TKGBY - AKBTY
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.62%
BNPQF - AKBTY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
CRARY - AKBTY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
MNSB - AKBTY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
CZFS - AKBTY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
More

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+0.02%
MCBS - CZFS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
BFC - CZFS
71%
Closely correlated
+3.19%
PFIS - CZFS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
BY - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
SMBC - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
More