AKTAF
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.01 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
57.87M
NE
Price
$29.30
Change
+$0.30 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 26, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.61B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AKTAF vs NE

Header iconAKTAF vs NE Comparison
Open Charts AKTAF vs NEBanner chart's image
Akita Drilling
Price$1.45
Change-$0.01 (-0.68%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization57.87M
Noble
Price$29.30
Change+$0.30 (+1.03%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization4.61B
AKTAF vs NE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AKTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKTAF vs. NE commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKTAF is a Hold and NE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AKTAF: $1.45 vs. NE: $29.00)
Brand notoriety: AKTAF and NE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKTAF: 25% vs. NE: 174%
Market capitalization -- AKTAF: $57.87M vs. NE: $4.61B
AKTAF [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $57.87M. NE’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $4.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $4.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKTAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AKTAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NE is a better buy in the long-term than AKTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKTAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AKTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AKTAF is a better buy in the short-term than NE.

Price Growth

AKTAF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while NE (@Contract Drilling) price change was -3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

NE is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (-0.93% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NE($4.61B) has a higher market cap than AKTAF($57.9M). NE has higher P/E ratio than AKTAF: NE (15.26) vs AKTAF (3.72). AKTAF YTD gains are higher at: 30.811 vs. NE (-2.086). NE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. AKTAF (55.4M). NE has more cash in the bank: 338M vs. AKTAF (11.6M). AKTAF has less debt than NE: AKTAF (41.7M) vs NE (1.98B). NE has higher revenues than AKTAF: NE (3.45B) vs AKTAF (223M).
AKTAFNEAKTAF / NE
Capitalization57.9M4.61B1%
EBITDA55.4M1.13B5%
Gain YTD30.811-2.086-1,477%
P/E Ratio3.7215.2624%
Revenue223M3.45B6%
Total Cash11.6M338M3%
Total Debt41.7M1.98B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AKTAF vs NE: Fundamental Ratings
AKTAF
NE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5146
SMR RATING
1..100
6179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NE's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AKTAF (51). This means that NE’s stock grew somewhat faster than AKTAF’s over the last 12 months.

NE's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AKTAF (51). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to AKTAF’s over the last 12 months.

AKTAF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as NE (79). This means that AKTAF’s stock grew similarly to NE’s over the last 12 months.

NE's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as AKTAF (57). This means that NE’s stock grew similarly to AKTAF’s over the last 12 months.

NE's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AKTAF (99). This means that NE’s stock grew significantly faster than AKTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKTAFNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AKTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDDYX37.30N/A
N/A
Columbia Dividend Income Inst3
JVTNX89.91N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Venture N
BRULX17.02N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R3
GGCPX15.93N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
LSFLX15.16N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4

AKTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AKTAF and ESVIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AKTAF and ESVIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKTAF
1D Price
Change %
AKTAF100%
-0.55%
ESVIF - AKTAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
SDRL - AKTAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
NE - AKTAF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
PHXHF - AKTAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
SHLLF - AKTAF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More