ALAB
Price
$55.67
Change
-$8.41 (-13.12%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.02B
39 days until earnings call
RMBS
Price
$46.13
Change
-$6.55 (-12.43%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.96B
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ALAB vs RMBS

Header iconALAB vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs RMBSBanner chart's image
Astera Labs
Price$55.67
Change-$8.41 (-13.12%)
Volume$68.57K
Capitalization9.02B
Rambus
Price$46.13
Change-$6.55 (-12.43%)
Volume$22.68K
Capitalization4.96B
ALAB vs RMBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALAB vs. RMBS commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALAB is a Hold and RMBS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ALAB: $64.08 vs. RMBS: $52.68)
Brand notoriety: ALAB and RMBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 82% vs. RMBS: 93%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $9.02B vs. RMBS: $4.96B
ALAB [@Semiconductors] is valued at $9.02B. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $4.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $2.48T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $45.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than ALAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALAB is a better buy in the short-term than RMBS.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а -4.29% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was -6.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -9.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-9.47% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALAB($9.02B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($4.96B). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: -12.694 vs. ALAB (-51.619). RMBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 244M vs. ALAB (-112.91M). ALAB has more cash in the bank: 914M vs. RMBS (482M). ALAB has less debt than RMBS: ALAB (1.29M) vs RMBS (30.2M). RMBS has higher revenues than ALAB: RMBS (557M) vs ALAB (396M).
ALABRMBSALAB / RMBS
Capitalization9.02B4.96B182%
EBITDA-112.91M244M-46%
Gain YTD-51.619-12.694407%
P/E RatioN/A31.93-
Revenue396M557M71%
Total Cash914M482M190%
Total Debt1.29M30.2M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWM21.761.33
+6.51%
ProShares Short Russell2000
HAUS19.09-0.45
-2.31%
Residential REIT ETF
STXV29.38-1.23
-4.02%
Strive 1000 Value ETF
XT55.54-2.51
-4.32%
iShares Exponential Technologies ETF
SSUS39.16-1.93
-4.70%
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Rsrch Smrt Sect ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+3.34%
CRDO - ALAB
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
AVGO - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
MTSI - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
ONTO - ALAB
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
RMBS - ALAB
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
-12.40%
KLIC - RMBS
73%
Closely correlated
-12.78%
LRCX - RMBS
73%
Closely correlated
-11.60%
KLAC - RMBS
72%
Closely correlated
-9.53%
AMAT - RMBS
71%
Closely correlated
-8.28%
VECO - RMBS
70%
Closely correlated
-9.37%
More