ALAB
Price
$97.95
Change
+$8.32 (+9.28%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.78B
47 days until earnings call
RMBS
Price
$61.90
Change
-$0.40 (-0.64%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.65B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB vs RMBS

Header iconALAB vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs RMBSBanner chart's image
Astera Labs
Price$97.95
Change+$8.32 (+9.28%)
Volume$9.73K
Capitalization14.78B
Rambus
Price$61.90
Change-$0.40 (-0.64%)
Volume$654.47K
Capitalization6.65B
ALAB vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALAB vs. RMBS commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALAB is a Buy and RMBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ALAB: $89.63 vs. RMBS: $61.90)
Brand notoriety: ALAB and RMBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 136% vs. RMBS: 66%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $14.78B vs. RMBS: $6.65B
ALAB [@Semiconductors] is valued at $14.78B. RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $6.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.76T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $58.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than ALAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the short-term than ALAB.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а -9.95% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+4.16% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALAB($14.8B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($6.65B). ALAB has higher P/E ratio than RMBS: ALAB (66.61) vs RMBS (32.41). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 17.102 vs. ALAB (-32.329). RMBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 276M vs. ALAB (-18.15M). ALAB has more cash in the bank: 925M vs. RMBS (514M). ALAB has less debt than RMBS: ALAB (1.29M) vs RMBS (29.2M). RMBS has higher revenues than ALAB: RMBS (605M) vs ALAB (490M).
ALABRMBSALAB / RMBS
Capitalization14.8B6.65B223%
EBITDA-18.15M276M-7%
Gain YTD-32.32917.102-189%
P/E Ratio66.6132.41206%
Revenue490M605M81%
Total Cash925M514M180%
Total Debt1.29M29.2M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHCB21.410.09
+0.42%
JHancock Corporate Bond ETF
XMAR38.080.01
+0.01%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar
CMBS48.50-0.01
-0.01%
iShares CMBS ETF
XLE84.54-0.37
-0.44%
The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF
WTV84.75-0.62
-0.73%
WisdomTree US Value ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been closely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+2.72%
CRDO - ALAB
69%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
AVGO - ALAB
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
MTSI - ALAB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
RMBS - ALAB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
NVDA - ALAB
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.33%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
-0.64%
LRCX - RMBS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
KLIC - RMBS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
AMKR - RMBS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
KLAC - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
VECO - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More