Advertisement
ALB vs BON
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Hold and BON is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBON’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ALB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- BON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BON’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while BON (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -6.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALB is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-2.52% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| ALB | BON | ALB / BON | |
| Capitalization | 13.7B | 14.3M | 95,804% |
| EBITDA | -281.58M | 2.3M | -12,259% |
| Gain YTD | 37.637 | -96.023 | -39% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.94 | 0.08 | 41,941% |
| Revenue | 4.99B | 23.8M | 20,979% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 80.5K | - |
| Total Debt | 3.72B | 7.3M | 50,932% |
ALB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ALB | BON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ZSB | 18.46 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd | |||
| MAYW | 32.90 | -0.10 | -0.29% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 May ETF | |||
| FDLO | 65.02 | -0.41 | -0.63% |
| Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | |||
| SDCI | 22.93 | -0.25 | -1.08% |
| USCF SummerHaven Dyn CmdtyStgy NoK-1 ETF | |||
| AFOS | 31.23 | -0.97 | -3.01% |
| ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | |||
BON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BON and NATR have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BON and NATR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BON | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| NATR - BON | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| DD - BON | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| CNEY - BON | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ALB - BON | 12% Poorly correlated | -7.37% | ||
| ECVT - BON | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
More | ||||