ALBHF
Price
$0.62
Change
+$0.06 (+10.71%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
9.58B
CLCGY
Price
$42.00
Change
+$0.09 (+0.21%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
Ad is loading...

ALBHF vs CLCGY

Header iconALBHF vs CLCGY Comparison
Open Charts ALBHF vs CLCGYBanner chart's image
Alibaba Health Information Technology
Price$0.62
Change+$0.06 (+10.71%)
Volume$149.27K
Capitalization9.58B
Clicks Group
Price$42.00
Change+$0.09 (+0.21%)
Volume$90.39K
Capitalization3.84B
ALBHF vs CLCGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALBHF vs. CLCGY commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALBHF is a Hold and CLCGY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ALBHF: $0.62 vs. CLCGY: $42.00)
Brand notoriety: ALBHF and CLCGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Drugstore Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALBHF: 508% vs. CLCGY: 1292%
Market capitalization -- ALBHF: $9.58B vs. CLCGY: $3.84B
ALBHF [@Drugstore Chains] is valued at $9.58B. CLCGY’s [@Drugstore Chains] market capitalization is $3.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Drugstore Chains] industry ranges from $18.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Drugstore Chains] industry is $4.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALBHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLCGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLCGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ALBHF and CLCGY are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

ALBHF (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а +12.55% price change this week, while CLCGY (@Drugstore Chains) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLCGY is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Drugstore Chains (+2.79% weekly)

The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALBHF($9.58B) has a higher market cap than CLCGY($3.84B). ALBHF has higher P/E ratio than CLCGY: ALBHF (129.87) vs CLCGY (25.84). ALBHF YTD gains are higher at: 54.450 vs. CLCGY (7.988). CLCGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.21B vs. ALBHF (557M). CLCGY has higher revenues than ALBHF: CLCGY (40B) vs ALBHF (26.8B).
ALBHFCLCGYALBHF / CLCGY
Capitalization9.58B3.84B249%
EBITDA557M5.21B11%
Gain YTD54.4507.988682%
P/E Ratio129.8725.84503%
Revenue26.8B40B67%
Total Cash10.9BN/A-
Total Debt77.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALBHF vs CLCGY: Fundamental Ratings
ALBHF
CLCGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9528
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1430
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALBHF's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (97). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

CLCGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALBHF (100). This means that CLCGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLCGY (98). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (41). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBHF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (30). This means that ALBHF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYZCX111.67N/A
N/A
Rydex Precious Metals C
VFWSX119.35N/A
N/A
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Instl
TEMEX15.91N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Beacon C
PGRCX47.12N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
LRSSX12.72N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R4

ALBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALBHF and ALBBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALBHF and ALBBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALBHF
1D Price
Change %
ALBHF100%
N/A
ALBBY - ALBHF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGT - ALBHF
19%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
SSY - ALBHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLCGY - ALBHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
HEWA - ALBHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLCGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCGY and WBA have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCGY and WBA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCGY
1D Price
Change %
CLCGY100%
+0.21%
WBA - CLCGY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGT - CLCGY
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
ALBHF - CLCGY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSMKF - CLCGY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEWA - CLCGY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More