ALBKY
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.02 (-2.25%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
95 days until earnings call
GPFOF
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.15 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALBKY vs GPFOF

Header iconALBKY vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts ALBKY vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
Alpha Services and Holdings SA
Price$0.87
Change-$0.02 (-2.25%)
Volume$308.14K
Capitalization4.23B
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.55
Change-$0.15 (-5.56%)
Volume$220
Capitalization14.96B
ALBKY vs GPFOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALBKY vs. GPFOF commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALBKY is a Hold and GPFOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ALBKY: $0.87 vs. GPFOF: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: ALBKY and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALBKY: 246% vs. GPFOF: 11%
Market capitalization -- ALBKY: $4.23B vs. GPFOF: $14.96B
ALBKY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.23B. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALBKY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALBKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALBKY is a better buy in the long-term than GPFOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALBKY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALBKY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALBKY is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

ALBKY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.79% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALBKY is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than ALBKY($4.24B). GPFOF (9.60) and ALBKY (9.17) have similar P/E ratio . ALBKY YTD gains are higher at: 131.070 vs. GPFOF (8.511). ALBKY has less debt than GPFOF: ALBKY (2.91B) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than ALBKY: GPFOF (62.4B) vs ALBKY (2.29B).
ALBKYGPFOFALBKY / GPFOF
Capitalization4.24B15B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD131.0708.5111,540%
P/E Ratio9.179.6096%
Revenue2.29B62.4B4%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.91B68.2B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALBKY vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
ALBKY
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
832
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1566
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALBKY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (58). This means that ALBKY’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

ALBKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (32). This means that ALBKY’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as ALBKY (9). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to ALBKY’s over the last 12 months.

ALBKY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (51). This means that ALBKY’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

ALBKY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (66). This means that ALBKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBKYGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQTI20.180.01
+0.04%
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
CUBA2.52N/A
N/A
Herzfeld Caribbean Basin Fund
TPYP35.44-0.05
-0.14%
Tortoise North American Pipeline
KMLM26.05-0.10
-0.37%
KraneShares Mount LucasMgdFutsIdxStgyETF
VFH125.23-2.55
-2.00%
Vanguard Financials ETF

ALBKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALBKY has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALBKY jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALBKY
1D Price
Change %
ALBKY100%
-1.46%
GPFOF - ALBKY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMBNF - ALBKY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFA - ALBKY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HARL - ALBKY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
CBWA - ALBKY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More