ALBT
Price
$2.32
Change
-$0.24 (-9.38%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.41M
ESRCF
Price
$1.55
Change
+$0.04 (+2.65%)
Updated
Jan 31 closing price
Capitalization
7.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALBT vs ESRCF

Header iconALBT vs ESRCF Comparison
Open Charts ALBT vs ESRCFBanner chart's image
Avalon GloboCare
Price$2.32
Change-$0.24 (-9.38%)
Volume$250
Capitalization3.41M
ESR Cayman
Price$1.55
Change+$0.04 (+2.65%)
Volume$340
Capitalization7.64B
ALBT vs ESRCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALBT vs. ESRCF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALBT is a StrongBuy and ESRCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ALBT: $2.32 vs. ESRCF: $1.55)
Brand notoriety: ALBT and ESRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALBT: 15% vs. ESRCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ALBT: $3.41M vs. ESRCF: $7.64B
ALBT [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $3.41M. ESRCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $7.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESRCF is a better buy in the long-term than ALBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ALBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ALBT (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +19.59% price change this week, while ESRCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.00% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESRCF($7.64B) has a higher market cap than ALBT($3.41M). ESRCF YTD gains are higher at: 2.649 vs. ALBT (-21.472). ESRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 670M vs. ALBT (-8.22M). ESRCF has more cash in the bank: 1.52B vs. ALBT (342K). ALBT has less debt than ESRCF: ALBT (8.1M) vs ESRCF (4.26B). ESRCF has higher revenues than ALBT: ESRCF (404M) vs ALBT (1.23M).
ALBTESRCFALBT / ESRCF
Capitalization3.41M7.64B0%
EBITDA-8.22M670M-1%
Gain YTD-21.4722.649-811%
P/E RatioN/A14.31-
Revenue1.23M404M0%
Total Cash342K1.52B0%
Total Debt8.1M4.26B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALBT: Fundamental Ratings
ALBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBTESRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIND13.050.70
+5.67%
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
DMYY13.090.09
+0.65%
dMY Squared Technology Group
ENR29.71-0.15
-0.50%
Energizer Holdings
NTRA138.13-1.99
-1.42%
Natera
QLGN1.76-0.14
-7.37%
Qualigen Therapeutics Inc

ALBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALBT and KW have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALBT and KW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALBT
1D Price
Change %
ALBT100%
+6.22%
KW - ALBT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
HOUS - ALBT
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
BEKE - ALBT
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
NMRK - ALBT
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
XHG - ALBT
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
More

ESRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESRCF and CTRGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESRCF and CTRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESRCF
1D Price
Change %
ESRCF100%
N/A
CTRGF - ESRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNGKY - ESRCF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
OZ - ESRCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
ALBT - ESRCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.22%
RMR - ESRCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More