Ad is loading...
ALCAX vs FRCZX
ALCAX vs FRCZX Comparison
Open Charts ALCAX vs FRCZX
AB Municipal Income California A
Price$10.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc Adv
Price$10.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
ALCAX vs FRCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCAX vs. FRCZX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCAX is a Hold and FRCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. ALCAX (1.2B). FRCZX (3.25) and ALCAX (3.17) have matching dividends . ALCAX was incepted earlier than FRCZX: ALCAX (38 years) vs FRCZX (17 years). ALCAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FRCZX (0.57). ALCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FRCZX (16.05). ALCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: ALCAX (2500) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.58 vs. ALCAX (1.08). ALCAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.04 vs. FRCZX (0.23).
| ALCAX | FRCZX | ALCAX / FRCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.49 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.57 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.593 | -1.208 | 132% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 1.32B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.25 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 1.58 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.95 | 4.48 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.04 | 0.23 | 3,883% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.03 | -0.05 | -21,161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers