Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALCAX vs FRCZX
ALCAX vs FRCZX Comparison
Open Charts ALCAX vs FRCZX
AB Municipal Income California A
Price$10.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc Adv
Price$11.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
ALCAX vs FRCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCAX vs. FRCZX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCAX is a Hold and FRCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. ALCAX (1.25B). FRCZX (3.35) and ALCAX (3.27) have matching dividends . ALCAX was incepted earlier than FRCZX: ALCAX (39 years) vs FRCZX (17 years). ALCAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FRCZX (0.57). ALCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FRCZX (22.85). ALCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: ALCAX (2500) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. ALCAX (1.81). ALCAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.25 vs. FRCZX (2.08).
| ALCAX | FRCZX | ALCAX / FRCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.49 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.57 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.913 | 3.260 | 89% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 1.35B | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 3.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 2.88 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 13.84 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.25 | 2.08 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.29 | 4.73 | 345% |