Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALCAX vs FRCZX
ALCAX vs FRCZX Comparison
Open Charts ALCAX vs FRCZX
AB Municipal Income California A
Price$10.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc Adv
Price$10.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
ALCAX vs FRCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCAX vs. FRCZX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCAX is a Hold and FRCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. ALCAX (1.22B). FRCZX (3.31) and ALCAX (3.28) have matching dividends . ALCAX was incepted earlier than FRCZX: ALCAX (38 years) vs FRCZX (17 years). ALCAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FRCZX (0.57). ALCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FRCZX (16.05). ALCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: ALCAX (2500) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. ALCAX (0.04). ALCAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.52 vs. FRCZX (-1.42).
| ALCAX | FRCZX | ALCAX / FRCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.49 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.57 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.404 | -0.530 | 265% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 1.29B | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 3.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.04 | 1.70 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.32 | 4.16 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.52 | -1.42 | -389% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.43 | 1.72 | 722% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement