Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALCAX vs PCMFX
ALCAX vs PCMFX Comparison
Open Charts ALCAX vs PCMFX
AB Municipal Income California A
Price$10.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
Principal California Municipal Instl
Price$9.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.16M
ALCAX vs PCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCAX vs. PCMFX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCAX is a Hold and PCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALCAX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. PCMFX (643M). PCMFX pays higher dividends than ALCAX: PCMFX (3.62) vs ALCAX (3.27). ALCAX was incepted earlier than PCMFX: ALCAX (39 years) vs PCMFX (11 years). ALCAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than PCMFX (0.65). PCMFX (35.90) and ALCAX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. PCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALCAX: PCMFX (0) vs ALCAX (2500). PCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.46 vs. ALCAX (1.81). ALCAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.25 vs. PCMFX (2.45).
| ALCAX | PCMFX | ALCAX / PCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.65 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.913 | 2.721 | 107% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 643M | 195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 3.62 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 2.46 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 15.75 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.25 | 2.45 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.29 | 24.53 | 66% |