Ad is loading...
ALCAX vs PCMFX
ALCAX vs PCMFX Comparison
Open Charts ALCAX vs PCMFX
AB Municipal Income California A
Price$10.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
Principal California Municipal Instl
Price$9.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets612.67M
ALCAX vs PCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCAX vs. PCMFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCAX is a Hold and PCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALCAX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. PCMFX (613M). PCMFX pays higher dividends than ALCAX: PCMFX (3.42) vs ALCAX (3.17). ALCAX was incepted earlier than PCMFX: ALCAX (38 years) vs PCMFX (10 years). ALCAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than PCMFX (0.65). PCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.90 vs. ALCAX (23.00). PCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALCAX: PCMFX (0) vs ALCAX (2500). PCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.26 vs. ALCAX (1.08). ALCAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.04 vs. PCMFX (4.34).
| ALCAX | PCMFX | ALCAX / PCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.65 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.593 | -1.688 | 94% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 613M | 196% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.42 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 1.26 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.95 | 4.39 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.04 | 4.34 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.03 | 21.05 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...