ALF
Price
$10.56
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
379.5M
BLUW
Price
$10.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
323.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALF vs BLUW

Header iconALF vs BLUW Comparison
Open Charts ALF vs BLUWBanner chart's image
Centurion Acquisition
Price$10.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$36.99K
Capitalization379.5M
Blue Water Acquisition Corp III
Price$10.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.54K
Capitalization323.08M
ALF vs BLUW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALF vs. BLUW commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALF is a StrongBuy and BLUW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ALF: $10.56 vs. BLUW: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: ALF and BLUW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALF: 80% vs. BLUW: 20%
Market capitalization -- ALF: $379.5M vs. BLUW: $323.08M
ALF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $379.5M. BLUW’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $323.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $179.84M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBLUW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BLUW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLUW is a better buy in the long-term than ALF.

Price Growth

ALF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while BLUW (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +67.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +71.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.47% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALF($380M) has a higher market cap than BLUW($323M). BLUW has more cash in the bank: 1.04M vs. ALF (423K).
ALFBLUWALF / BLUW
Capitalization380M323M118%
EBITDA-625.11KN/A-
Gain YTD4.554N/A-
P/E Ratio24.00N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash423K1.04M41%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGGQ51.470.66
+1.31%
NestYield Visionary ETF
KOCT33.330.18
+0.54%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
HCRB35.58N/A
+0.01%
Hartford Core Bond ETF
SPBO29.56-0.02
-0.07%
SPDR® Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
EZJ50.54-0.34
-0.66%
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan

ALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALF and GRAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALF and GRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALF
1D Price
Change %
ALF100%
+0.09%
GRAF - ALF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - ALF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBMC - ALF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZL - ALF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
HSPOU - ALF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BLUW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLUW and TDAC have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLUW and TDAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLUW
1D Price
Change %
BLUW100%
N/A
TDAC - BLUW
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLAC - BLUW
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
ALF - BLUW
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
SVII - BLUW
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
ASPCU - BLUW
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More