Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALMAX vs WCMLX
ALMAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ALMAX vs WCMLX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth A
Price$14.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets361.33M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
ALMAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALMAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALMAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALMAX has more cash in the bank: 361M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). ALMAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ALMAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ALMAX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ALMAX (1.26). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ALMAX (46.68). ALMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ALMAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). ALMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. WCMLX (4.77). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.13 vs. ALMAX (-19.67).
| ALMAX | WCMLX | ALMAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.99 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.79 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.163 | 5.832 | 37% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361M | 44.8M | 806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 4.77 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.21 | 22.83 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.67 | 17.13 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.60 | N/A | - |