Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALMCX vs NRGSX
ALMCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ALMCX vs NRGSX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth C
Price$7.32
Change+$0.14 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.92M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.89
Change+$0.30 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.35B
ALMCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALMCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALMCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.35B vs. ALMCX (324M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ALMCX: NRGSX (0.07) vs ALMCX (0.00). ALMCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ALMCX (24 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ALMCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ALMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.68 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALMCX: NRGSX (0) vs ALMCX (1000). ALMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.83 vs. NRGSX (-16.10). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -9.86 vs. ALMCX (-44.90).
| ALMCX | NRGSX | ALMCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.74 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.74 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.104 | -5.754 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 8.35B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.83 | -16.10 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.89 | -3.70 | -349% |
| Returns for 5 years | -44.90 | -9.86 | 455% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.49 | 4.12 | -1,251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers