ALPIB
Price
$29.00
Change
-$0.25 (-0.85%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
440.68M
FNWB
Price
$8.18
Change
+$0.16 (+2.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
72.82M
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALPIB vs FNWB

Header iconALPIB vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts ALPIB vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Alpine Banks of Colorado
Price$29.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.85%)
Volume$4.28K
Capitalization440.68M
First Northwest Ban
Price$8.18
Change+$0.16 (+2.00%)
Volume$83.55K
Capitalization72.82M
ALPIB vs FNWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALPIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALPIB vs. FNWB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALPIB is a StrongBuy and FNWB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ALPIB: $29.00 vs. FNWB: $8.18)
Brand notoriety: ALPIB and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALPIB: 282% vs. FNWB: 396%
Market capitalization -- ALPIB: $440.68M vs. FNWB: $72.82M
ALPIB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $440.68M. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $72.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALPIB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALPIB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALPIB is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALPIB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALPIB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALPIB is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

ALPIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALPIB($441M) has a higher market cap than FNWB($72.8M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than ALPIB: FNWB (43.38) vs ALPIB (9.97). ALPIB YTD gains are higher at: -12.768 vs. FNWB (-18.756). ALPIB has less debt than FNWB: ALPIB (119M) vs FNWB (324M). ALPIB has higher revenues than FNWB: ALPIB (230M) vs FNWB (62.5M).
ALPIBFNWBALPIB / FNWB
Capitalization441M72.8M606%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.768-18.75668%
P/E Ratio9.9743.3823%
Revenue230M62.5M368%
Total CashN/A16.8M-
Total Debt119M324M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALPIB vs FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
ALPIB
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5024
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
3291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALPIB's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (88) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALPIB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

ALPIB's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALPIB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

ALPIB's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALPIB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

ALPIB's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as FNWB (63) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ALPIB’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALPIB (52) in the null industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALPIB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALPIBFNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
45%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALPIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KTRSX9.410.01
+0.11%
DWS Global Income Builder S
WHGLX14.08N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality Value Fund Inst
CNREX23.99-0.08
-0.33%
Commonwealth Real Estate Securities
MRGCX43.67-0.17
-0.39%
MFS Core Equity C
CSSCX20.26-0.10
-0.49%
Columbia Small Cap Value I C

ALPIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALPIB and WTBFA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALPIB and WTBFA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALPIB
1D Price
Change %
ALPIB100%
-0.85%
WTBFA - ALPIB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNWD - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
FNWB - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
VABK - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.68%
PKBK - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
More

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with AX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then AX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+2.00%
AX - FNWB
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
UCB - FNWB
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
PNC - FNWB
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
SSB - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
HOPE - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
More