ALPIB
Price
$30.00
Change
-$0.25 (-0.83%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
234.85M
FNWB
Price
$9.83
Change
+$0.13 (+1.34%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
149.01M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ALPIB vs FNWB

Header iconALPIB vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts ALPIB vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Alpine Banks of Colorado
Price$30.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.83%)
Volume$525
Capitalization234.85M
First Northwest Ban
Price$9.83
Change+$0.13 (+1.34%)
Volume$5.6K
Capitalization149.01M
ALPIB vs FNWB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALPIB vs. FNWB commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALPIB is a Hold and FNWB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ALPIB: $30.00 vs. FNWB: $9.83)
Brand notoriety: ALPIB and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALPIB: 68% vs. FNWB: 28%
Market capitalization -- ALPIB: $234.85M vs. FNWB: $149.01M
ALPIB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $234.85M. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $149.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALPIB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALPIB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALPIB is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ALPIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALPIB($235M) has a higher market cap than FNWB($149M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than ALPIB: FNWB (60.69) vs ALPIB (6.25). FNWB YTD gains are higher at: -3.055 vs. ALPIB (-11.779). FNWB (321M) and ALPIB (328M) have identical debt. ALPIB has higher revenues than FNWB: ALPIB (257M) vs FNWB (65.5M).
ALPIBFNWBALPIB / FNWB
Capitalization235M149M158%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.779-3.055386%
P/E Ratio6.2560.6910%
Revenue257M65.5M392%
Total CashN/A20.6M-
Total Debt328M321M102%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYSGX45.300.40
+0.89%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth A
RAPIX10.470.09
+0.87%
Cohen & Steers Real Assets I
GICAX13.330.11
+0.83%
Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts A
LSVVX12.840.08
+0.63%
LSV Conservative Value Equity
GSRLX11.240.05
+0.45%
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr Instl

ALPIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALPIB and WTBFA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALPIB and WTBFA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALPIB
1D Price
Change %
ALPIB100%
-0.83%
WTBFA - ALPIB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNWD - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
FNWB - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
VABK - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
PKBK - ALPIB
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
More

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with OZKAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then OZKAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+1.34%
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
FMBH - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
OCFCP - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
WNEB - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
WTFCP - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More