ALSSF
Price
$2.89
Change
-$0.09 (-3.02%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.4B
BROS
Price
$62.99
Change
-$0.27 (-0.43%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSSF vs BROS

Header iconALSSF vs BROS Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs BROSBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$2.89
Change-$0.09 (-3.02%)
Volume$550
Capitalization2.4B
Dutch Bros
Price$62.99
Change-$0.27 (-0.43%)
Volume$2.52M
Capitalization8B
ALSSF vs BROS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. BROS commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a Buy and BROS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $2.89 vs. BROS: $62.99)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and BROS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 21% vs. BROS: 84%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $2.4B vs. BROS: $8B
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.4B. BROS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBROS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BROS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than BROS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BROS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BROS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the short-term than BROS.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BROS (@Restaurants) price change was -4.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.78% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BROS($8B) has a higher market cap than ALSSF($2.4B). BROS has higher P/E ratio than ALSSF: BROS (136.93) vs ALSSF (74.86). ALSSF YTD gains are higher at: 38.942 vs. BROS (20.256). ALSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.3B vs. BROS (210M). ALSSF has more cash in the bank: 4.08B vs. BROS (316M). BROS has less debt than ALSSF: BROS (1.02B) vs ALSSF (52.6B). ALSSF has higher revenues than BROS: ALSSF (80.8B) vs BROS (1.36B).
ALSSFBROSALSSF / BROS
Capitalization2.4B8B30%
EBITDA15.3B210M7,286%
Gain YTD38.94220.256192%
P/E Ratio74.86136.9355%
Revenue80.8B1.36B5,937%
Total Cash4.08B316M1,290%
Total Debt52.6B1.02B5,152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSSFBROS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGRDX48.520.21
+0.43%
MFS International Growth R6
DOMIX11.060.03
+0.27%
Domini Impact International Equity Inv
BCAIX36.36N/A
N/A
Boston Common ESG Impact Intl
DLCIX23.82N/A
N/A
Dana Large Cap Equity Institutional
ACAYX56.84N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl Y

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and FBGI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and FBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
N/A
FBGI - ALSSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
BROS - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BROS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BROS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BROS
1D Price
Change %
BROS100%
-0.43%
FRSH - BROS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
CAVA - BROS
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
SHAK - BROS
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
FWRG - BROS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
CMG - BROS
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More