ALSSF
Price
$3.05
Change
+$0.04 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
FBGI
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
340.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSSF vs FBGI

Header iconALSSF vs FBGI Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs FBGIBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$3.05
Change+$0.04 (+1.33%)
Volume$3.35K
Capitalization2.34B
Foodbase Group
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$77.64K
Capitalization340.81M
ALSSF vs FBGI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. FBGI commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a StrongBuy and FBGI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $3.05 vs. FBGI: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and FBGI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 112% vs. FBGI: 100%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $2.34B vs. FBGI: $340.81M
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.34B. FBGI’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $340.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBGI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than FBGI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ALSSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а +17.31% price change this week, while FBGI (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.12% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSSF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than FBGI($341M). ALSSF YTD gains are higher at: 46.635 vs. FBGI (9.091).
ALSSFFBGIALSSF / FBGI
Capitalization2.34B341M685%
EBITDA15.3BN/A-
Gain YTD46.6359.091513%
P/E Ratio78.55N/A-
Revenue80.8BN/A-
Total Cash4.08BN/A-
Total Debt52.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF vs FBGI: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
FBGI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8942
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
7693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALSSF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (34). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBGI (100). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (93). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (55). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBGI (100). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSSFFBGI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STMDX36.42N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Real Estate I
FCGSX26.04N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Growth Company
NMSAX21.30N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Index A
GTORX40.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps R6
MVGLX18.30-0.03
-0.16%
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R3

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and FBGI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and FBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
+1.33%
FBGI - ALSSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
BROS - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBGI and JBFCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBGI and JBFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBGI
1D Price
Change %
FBGI100%
N/A
JBFCF - FBGI
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
ALSSF - FBGI
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
BROS - FBGI
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
RTBRF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More