ALSSF
Price
$3.05
Change
+$0.04 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
FWRG
Price
$17.28
Change
+$0.26 (+1.53%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSSF vs FWRG

Header iconALSSF vs FWRG Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs FWRGBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$3.05
Change+$0.04 (+1.33%)
Volume$3.35K
Capitalization2.34B
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$17.28
Change+$0.26 (+1.53%)
Volume$470.97K
Capitalization1.05B
ALSSF vs FWRG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. FWRG commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a StrongBuy and FWRG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $3.05 vs. FWRG: $17.28)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and FWRG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 112% vs. FWRG: 57%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $2.34B vs. FWRG: $1.05B
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.34B. FWRG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFWRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than FWRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWRG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FWRG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the short-term than FWRG.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а +17.31% price change this week, while FWRG (@Restaurants) price change was +2.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.12% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSSF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than FWRG($1.05B). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than ALSSF: FWRG (101.65) vs ALSSF (78.55). ALSSF YTD gains are higher at: 46.635 vs. FWRG (-7.147). ALSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.3B vs. FWRG (91.9M). ALSSF has more cash in the bank: 4.08B vs. FWRG (18.6M). FWRG has less debt than ALSSF: FWRG (837M) vs ALSSF (52.6B). ALSSF has higher revenues than FWRG: ALSSF (80.8B) vs FWRG (1.06B).
ALSSFFWRGALSSF / FWRG
Capitalization2.34B1.05B222%
EBITDA15.3B91.9M16,649%
Gain YTD46.635-7.147-653%
P/E Ratio78.55101.6577%
Revenue80.8B1.06B7,652%
Total Cash4.08B18.6M21,909%
Total Debt52.6B837M6,284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSSFFWRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPFAX29.24N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth A
TRIIX4.88N/A
N/A
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income I
ANPRX29.86N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value R6
VSMCX10.47N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Value C
TADFX8.44N/A
N/A
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Inc R6

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and FBGI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and FBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
+1.33%
FBGI - ALSSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
BROS - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with KRUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then KRUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+1.53%
KRUS - FWRG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
CAKE - FWRG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
DIN - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
BJRI - FWRG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More