ALSSF
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.06 (+2.74%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
SGLOF
Price
$17.82
Change
-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Ad is loading...

ALSSF vs SGLOF

Header iconALSSF vs SGLOF Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs SGLOFBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$2.25
Change+$0.06 (+2.74%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
FOOD & LIFE COS
Price$17.82
Change-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Volume$131.9K
CapitalizationN/A
ALSSF vs SGLOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. SGLOF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a Buy and SGLOF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $2.25 vs. SGLOF: $17.82)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and SGLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 12% vs. SGLOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $1.78B vs. SGLOF: $2.53B
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.78B. SGLOF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGLOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than SGLOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ALSSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while SGLOF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-5.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGLOF($2.53B) has a higher market cap than ALSSF($1.78B). SGLOF has higher P/E ratio than ALSSF: SGLOF (29.75) vs ALSSF (8.27). SGLOF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. ALSSF (-39.516). SGLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.2B vs. ALSSF (17.4B). SGLOF has more cash in the bank: 58.1B vs. ALSSF (4.03B). ALSSF has less debt than SGLOF: ALSSF (49.2B) vs SGLOF (217B). SGLOF has higher revenues than ALSSF: SGLOF (334B) vs ALSSF (77.1B).
ALSSFSGLOFALSSF / SGLOF
Capitalization1.78B2.53B70%
EBITDA17.4B47.2B37%
Gain YTD-39.5160.000-
P/E Ratio8.2729.7528%
Revenue77.1B334B23%
Total Cash4.03B58.1B7%
Total Debt49.2B217B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSSFSGLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMSFX10.58-0.07
-0.66%
Destinations Multi Strategy Alts I
MSJIX17.30-0.12
-0.69%
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance I
TPVIX20.11-0.31
-1.52%
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value I
RDWCX10.59-0.19
-1.76%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R3
SVACX5.84-0.14
-2.34%
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div C

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and FBGI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and FBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
N/A
FBGI - ALSSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
BROS - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLOF and RSTRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLOF and RSTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLOF
1D Price
Change %
SGLOF100%
N/A
RSTRF - SGLOF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BROS - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
MTYFF - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
FWRG - SGLOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.17%
MBPFF - SGLOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More