ALSSF
Price
$2.74
Change
+$0.15 (+5.79%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.13B
SGLOF
Price
$17.82
Change
-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSSF vs SGLOF

Header iconALSSF vs SGLOF Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs SGLOFBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$2.74
Change+$0.15 (+5.79%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.13B
FOOD & LIFE COS
Price$17.82
Change-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Volume$131.9K
Capitalization5.09B
ALSSF vs SGLOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. SGLOF commentary
Jun 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a Hold and SGLOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 13, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $2.74 vs. SGLOF: $17.82)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and SGLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 38% vs. SGLOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $2.13B vs. SGLOF: $5.09B
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.13B. SGLOF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $5.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGLOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than SGLOF.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while SGLOF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGLOF($5.09B) has a higher market cap than ALSSF($2.13B). ALSSF has higher P/E ratio than SGLOF: ALSSF (72.48) vs SGLOF (29.75). ALSSF YTD gains are higher at: 31.611 vs. SGLOF (0.000). ALSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.74T vs. SGLOF (47.2B). SGLOF has more cash in the bank: 58.1B vs. ALSSF (6.47B). ALSSF has less debt than SGLOF: ALSSF (50.3B) vs SGLOF (217B). SGLOF has higher revenues than ALSSF: SGLOF (334B) vs ALSSF (79B).
ALSSFSGLOFALSSF / SGLOF
Capitalization2.13B5.09B42%
EBITDA8.74T47.2B18,506%
Gain YTD31.6110.000-
P/E Ratio72.4829.75244%
Revenue79B334B24%
Total Cash6.47B58.1B11%
Total Debt50.3B217B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLPAX13.59N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap A (SIIT)
TGRFX7.35N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Focus R6
FFNCX13.35N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
JAMCX34.82N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value A
MGQSX17.94N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars R6

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and FBGI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and FBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
+5.69%
FBGI - ALSSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
BROS - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLOF and RSTRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLOF and RSTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLOF
1D Price
Change %
SGLOF100%
N/A
RSTRF - SGLOF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BROS - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
MTYFF - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - SGLOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
MBPFF - SGLOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More