ALSSF
Price
$2.30
Change
+$0.10 (+4.55%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
SGLOF
Price
$17.82
Change
-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.94B
Ad is loading...

ALSSF vs SGLOF

Header iconALSSF vs SGLOF Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs SGLOFBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$2.30
Change+$0.10 (+4.55%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization1.87B
FOOD & LIFE COS
Price$17.82
Change-$1.78 (-9.08%)
Volume$131.9K
Capitalization3.94B
ALSSF vs SGLOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. SGLOF commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a Hold and SGLOF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $2.30 vs. SGLOF: $17.82)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and SGLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 48% vs. SGLOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $1.87B vs. SGLOF: $3.94B
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.87B. SGLOF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $226.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGLOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than SGLOF.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а +14.14% price change this week, while SGLOF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +4.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+4.83% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGLOF($3.94B) has a higher market cap than ALSSF($1.87B). ALSSF has higher P/E ratio than SGLOF: ALSSF (41.64) vs SGLOF (29.75). ALSSF YTD gains are higher at: 10.577 vs. SGLOF (0.000). ALSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.74T vs. SGLOF (47.2B). SGLOF has more cash in the bank: 58.1B vs. ALSSF (6.47B). ALSSF has less debt than SGLOF: ALSSF (50.3B) vs SGLOF (217B). SGLOF has higher revenues than ALSSF: SGLOF (334B) vs ALSSF (79B).
ALSSFSGLOFALSSF / SGLOF
Capitalization1.87B3.94B47%
EBITDA8.74T47.2B18,506%
Gain YTD10.5770.000-
P/E Ratio41.6429.75140%
Revenue79B334B24%
Total Cash6.47B58.1B11%
Total Debt50.3B217B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACIZX41.440.77
+1.89%
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl Z-2
JMGQX45.590.25
+0.55%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R4
SUVAX11.24N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val A
CGRWX29.96-0.03
-0.10%
Invesco Comstock Select A
WEECX10.59-0.06
-0.56%
TETON Westwood Equity A

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and FBGI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and FBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
+4.55%
FBGI - ALSSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
BROS - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLOF and RSTRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLOF and RSTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLOF
1D Price
Change %
SGLOF100%
N/A
RSTRF - SGLOF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BROS - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
MTYFF - SGLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.33%
FWRG - SGLOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
MBPFF - SGLOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More