It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNURAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMADF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NURAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMADF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while NURAF (@Information Technology Services) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.80%.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
AMADF | NURAF | AMADF / NURAF | |
Capitalization | 31B | 17.1B | 181% |
EBITDA | 2.27B | 181B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -1.271 | 2.577 | -49% |
P/E Ratio | 23.40 | 30.23 | 77% |
Revenue | 5.8B | 751B | 1% |
Total Cash | 994M | 167B | 1% |
Total Debt | 3.73B | 276B | 1% |
AMADF | NURAF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMADF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as NURAF (41). This means that AMADF’s stock grew similarly to NURAF’s over the last 12 months.
AMADF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NURAF (100). This means that AMADF’s stock grew similarly to NURAF’s over the last 12 months.
AMADF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NURAF (100). This means that AMADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NURAF’s over the last 12 months.
NURAF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as AMADF (58). This means that NURAF’s stock grew similarly to AMADF’s over the last 12 months.
NURAF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as AMADF (59). This means that NURAF’s stock grew similarly to AMADF’s over the last 12 months.
AMADF | NURAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago38% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago65% | 17 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMADF has been loosely correlated with AMADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMADF jumps, then AMADY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMADF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMADF | 100% | -0.62% | ||
AMADY - AMADF | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
NURAF - AMADF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
NGRRF - AMADF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
DMRC - AMADF | 22% Poorly correlated | +8.31% | ||
FJTSY - AMADF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NURAF has been loosely correlated with NRILY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NURAF jumps, then NRILY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NURAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NURAF | 100% | -0.69% | ||
NRILY - NURAF | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
AMADF - NURAF | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
BR - NURAF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
NTDTY - NURAF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
FIS - NURAF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More |