AMBC
Price
$8.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
700.08M
39 days until earnings call
FNF
Price
$66.59
Change
+$0.67 (+1.02%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
14.46B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMBC vs FNF

Header iconAMBC vs FNF Comparison
Open Charts AMBC vs FNFBanner chart's image
Ambac Financial Group
Price$8.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.79K
Capitalization700.08M
Fidelity National Financial
Price$66.59
Change+$0.67 (+1.02%)
Volume$1.25M
Capitalization14.46B
AMBC vs FNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBC vs. FNF commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBC is a Hold and FNF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBC: $8.25 vs. FNF: $66.59)
Brand notoriety: AMBC and FNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBC: 144% vs. FNF: 95%
Market capitalization -- AMBC: $700.08M vs. FNF: $14.46B
AMBC [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $700.08M. FNF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $14.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNF is a better buy in the long-term than AMBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBC is a better buy in the short-term than FNF.

Price Growth

AMBC (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -7.20% price change this week, while FNF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

FNF is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+0.45% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNF($14.5B) has a higher market cap than AMBC($700M). AMBC has higher P/E ratio than FNF: AMBC (86.06) vs FNF (27.70). FNF YTD gains are higher at: 19.537 vs. AMBC (-34.783). FNF has more cash in the bank: 26.6B vs. AMBC (2.24B). AMBC has less debt than FNF: AMBC (3.48B) vs FNF (4.28B). FNF has higher revenues than AMBC: FNF (11.5B) vs AMBC (266M).
AMBCFNFAMBC / FNF
Capitalization700M14.5B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-34.78319.537-178%
P/E Ratio86.0627.70311%
Revenue266M11.5B2%
Total Cash2.24B26.6B8%
Total Debt3.48B4.28B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBC vs FNF: Fundamental Ratings
AMBC
FNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2315
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
694
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNF's Valuation (41) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBC (75). This means that FNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBC (100). This means that FNF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's SMR Rating (95) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMBC (97). This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBC (85). This means that FNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

AMBC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNF (94). This means that AMBC’s stock grew significantly faster than FNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBCFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SF96.501.70
+1.79%
Stifel Financial Corp
MCS16.980.28
+1.68%
Marcus Corp (The)
ANDE43.570.20
+0.46%
Andersons
ACM.X0.841618-0.059118
-6.56%
AC Milan Fan Token cryptocurrency
CLV.X0.023666-0.005734
-19.50%
CLV cryptocurrency

AMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBC has been loosely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBC jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBC
1D Price
Change %
AMBC100%
-5.71%
FNF - AMBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
ACT - AMBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
NMIH - AMBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
ESNT - AMBC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
RDN - AMBC
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
More