AMBC
Price
$6.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
700.08M
58 days until earnings call
MTG
Price
$26.85
Change
-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.01B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBC vs MTG

Header iconAMBC vs MTG Comparison
Open Charts AMBC vs MTGBanner chart's image
Ambac Financial Group
Price$6.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$887.09K
Capitalization700.08M
MGIC Investment
Price$26.85
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$1.88M
Capitalization6.01B
AMBC vs MTG Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBC vs. MTG commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBC is a Hold and MTG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBC: $6.80 vs. MTG: $26.85)
Brand notoriety: AMBC and MTG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBC: 81% vs. MTG: 112%
Market capitalization -- AMBC: $700.08M vs. MTG: $6.01B
AMBC [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $700.08M. MTG’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $6.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTG is a better buy in the long-term than AMBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MTG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMBC and MTG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMBC (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -7.98% price change this week, while MTG (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBC is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

MTG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTG($6.01B) has a higher market cap than AMBC($700M). AMBC has higher P/E ratio than MTG: AMBC (86.06) vs MTG (8.79). MTG YTD gains are higher at: 14.410 vs. AMBC (-46.245). MTG has more cash in the bank: 6.09B vs. AMBC (2.24B). MTG has less debt than AMBC: MTG (643M) vs AMBC (3.48B). MTG has higher revenues than AMBC: MTG (1.16B) vs AMBC (266M).
AMBCMTGAMBC / MTG
Capitalization700M6.01B12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-46.24514.410-321%
P/E Ratio86.068.79979%
Revenue266M1.16B23%
Total Cash2.24B6.09B37%
Total Debt3.48B643M540%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBC vs MTG: Fundamental Ratings
AMBC
MTG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6970
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMBC's Valuation (70) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as MTG (83). This means that AMBC’s stock grew similarly to MTG’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBC (100). This means that MTG’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's SMR Rating (92) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMBC (94). This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMBC (65). This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

AMBC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as MTG (37). This means that AMBC’s stock grew similarly to MTG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBCMTG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIJFX88.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials Z
FTHNX43.57N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq Inv
DHFIX13.68N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated I
CLARX8.17-0.06
-0.73%
NYLI CBRE Real Estate Class A
MTCKX42.79-0.61
-1.41%
MFS Technology R1

AMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBC has been loosely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBC jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBC
1D Price
Change %
AMBC100%
N/A
AXS - AMBC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
NMIH - AMBC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
MTG - AMBC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
ESNT - AMBC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
FAF - AMBC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
More