Advertisement
AMBFF vs ICCM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBFF is a StrongBuy and ICCM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMBFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileICCM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMBFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ICCM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMBFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICCM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMBFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- ICCM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMBFF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while ICCM (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
ICCM is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.60% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AMBFF | ICCM | AMBFF / ICCM | |
| Capitalization | 3.97B | 60.6M | 6,553% |
| EBITDA | 834M | -15.54M | -5,365% |
| Gain YTD | -23.065 | -19.750 | 117% |
| P/E Ratio | 73.45 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.83B | 2.79M | 209,329% |
| Total Cash | 640M | 5.38M | 11,889% |
| Total Debt | 554M | 2.37M | 23,376% |
AMBFF | ICCM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ICCM's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBFF (83). This means that ICCM’s stock grew similarly to AMBFF’s over the last 12 months.
ICCM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBFF (100). This means that ICCM’s stock grew similarly to AMBFF’s over the last 12 months.
AMBFF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as ICCM (100). This means that AMBFF’s stock grew similarly to ICCM’s over the last 12 months.
AMBFF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as ICCM (64). This means that AMBFF’s stock grew similarly to ICCM’s over the last 12 months.
AMBFF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as ICCM (100). This means that AMBFF’s stock grew similarly to ICCM’s over the last 12 months.
| AMBFF | ICCM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 19% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
AMBFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBFF has been loosely correlated with ICCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBFF jumps, then ICCM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBFF | 100% | +4.08% | ||
| ICCM - AMBFF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| AHICF - AMBFF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMBBY - AMBFF | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.69% | ||
| NNOX - AMBFF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| ANSLF - AMBFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ICCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICCM has been closely correlated with SINT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICCM jumps, then SINT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICCM | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| SINT - ICCM | 67% Closely correlated | +7.06% | ||
| AMBFF - ICCM | 45% Loosely correlated | +4.08% | ||
| BSX - ICCM | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| ILMN - ICCM | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
| PEN - ICCM | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.32% | ||
More | ||||