AMBK
Price
$14.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
27 days until earnings call
KNFSF
Price
$1.32
Change
-$0.46 (-25.84%)
Updated
Feb 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

AMBK vs KNFSF

Header iconAMBK vs KNFSF Comparison
Open Charts AMBK vs KNFSFBanner chart's image
American Bank
Price$14.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Kiatnakin Phatra Bank Public
Price$1.32
Change-$0.46 (-25.84%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
AMBK vs KNFSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBK vs. KNFSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBK is a Buy and KNFSF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AMBK: $14.26 vs. KNFSF: $1.32)
Brand notoriety: AMBK and KNFSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBK: 116% vs. KNFSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AMBK: $36.02M vs. KNFSF: $1.23B
AMBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $36.02M. KNFSF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKNFSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KNFSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KNFSF is a better buy in the long-term than AMBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AMBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AMBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KNFSF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KNFSF($1.23B) has a higher market cap than AMBK($36M). AMBK YTD gains are higher at: -17.135 vs. KNFSF (-25.843). AMBK has less debt than KNFSF: AMBK (83.6M) vs KNFSF (94.1B). KNFSF has higher revenues than AMBK: KNFSF (26.7B) vs AMBK (10.5M).
AMBKKNFSFAMBK / KNFSF
Capitalization36M1.23B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.135-25.84366%
P/E RatioN/A6.39-
Revenue10.5M26.7B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt83.6M94.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBK: Fundamental Ratings
AMBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBKKNFSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINT100.54N/A
N/A
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
SIXO32.34-0.47
-1.42%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Apr/Oct ETF
EXI141.72-3.54
-2.44%
iShares Global Industrials ETF
RODE28.03-0.81
-2.82%
Hartford Multifactor Divers Intl ETF
SURI16.58-0.64
-3.72%
Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF

AMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBK has been loosely correlated with COSO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBK jumps, then COSO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBK
1D Price
Change %
AMBK100%
N/A
COSO - AMBK
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
CMTDF - AMBK
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.83%
KNFSF - AMBK
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBH - AMBK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWBK - AMBK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KNFSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KNFSF and HCKG have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KNFSF and HCKG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KNFSF
1D Price
Change %
KNFSF100%
N/A
HCKG - KNFSF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - KNFSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFDL - KNFSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
CRSB - KNFSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFLC - KNFSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More