AMBO
Price
$3.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 18, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.65M
84 days until earnings call
RBA
Price
$118.39
Change
+$0.27 (+0.23%)
Updated
Sep 18, 01:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.76B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBO vs RBA

Header iconAMBO vs RBA Comparison
Open Charts AMBO vs RBABanner chart's image
Ambow Education Holding
Price$3.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization10.65M
RB Global
Price$118.39
Change+$0.27 (+0.23%)
Volume$153
Capitalization21.76B
AMBO vs RBA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBO vs. RBA commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBO is a StrongBuy and RBA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBO: $3.72 vs. RBA: $118.12)
Brand notoriety: AMBO and RBA are both not notable
AMBO represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while RBA is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBO: 9% vs. RBA: 153%
Market capitalization -- AMBO: $10.65M vs. RBA: $21.76B
AMBO [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $10.65M. RBA’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $21.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.65B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBA is a better buy in the long-term than AMBO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RBA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBO is a better buy in the short-term than RBA.

Price Growth

AMBO (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while RBA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.76%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBO is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.

RBA is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+2.09% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.21% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBA($21.8B) has a higher market cap than AMBO($10.7M). RBA has higher P/E ratio than AMBO: RBA (58.19) vs AMBO (5.38). AMBO YTD gains are higher at: 77.143 vs. RBA (32.054). RBA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.37B vs. AMBO (160K). RBA has more cash in the bank: 710M vs. AMBO (4.06M). AMBO has less debt than RBA: AMBO (12.4M) vs RBA (4.25B). RBA has higher revenues than AMBO: RBA (4.42B) vs AMBO (9.7M).
AMBORBAAMBO / RBA
Capitalization10.7M21.8B0%
EBITDA160K1.37B0%
Gain YTD77.14332.054241%
P/E Ratio5.3858.199%
Revenue9.7M4.42B0%
Total Cash4.06M710M1%
Total Debt12.4M4.25B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBO vs RBA: Fundamental Ratings
AMBO
RBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2182
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
3779
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9925
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBA's Valuation (75) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as AMBO (95) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew similarly to AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

RBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBO (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

AMBO's SMR Rating (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBA (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AMBO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBA’s over the last 12 months.

AMBO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as RBA (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AMBO’s stock grew similarly to RBA’s over the last 12 months.

RBA's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBO (99) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBORBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IONL97.079.04
+10.27%
GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF
BNDD100.420.13
+0.13%
Quadratic Deflation ETF
PFFA22.410.01
+0.04%
Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF
EPRF18.75N/A
N/A
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Prfrd ETF
DJAN41.89-0.01
-0.02%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Jan

AMBO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBO has been loosely correlated with KODK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBO jumps, then KODK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBO
1D Price
Change %
AMBO100%
-0.27%
KODK - AMBO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
RBA - AMBO
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
FCN - AMBO
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
CRAI - AMBO
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
QUAD - AMBO
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
More

RBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBA has been loosely correlated with PRSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBA jumps, then PRSU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBA
1D Price
Change %
RBA100%
+0.54%
PRSU - RBA
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
AZZ - RBA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
MSA - RBA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
CTAS - RBA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
GHC - RBA
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More