It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGIH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGIH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -4.67% price change this week, while MGIH (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -4.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.
AMBP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
MGIH is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2023.
The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
AMBP | MGIH | AMBP / MGIH | |
Capitalization | 2.05B | 16.6M | 12,349% |
EBITDA | 508M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -10.957 | 16.935 | -65% |
P/E Ratio | 40.65 | 5.81 | 699% |
Revenue | 4.81B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 434M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 3.73B | N/A | - |
AMBP | MGIH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago59% | 22 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago77% | 8 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMBP | 100% | +0.99% | ||
CCK - AMBP | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
BALL - AMBP | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
PTVE - AMBP | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SEE - AMBP | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
AVY - AMBP | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MGIH and OI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGIH and OI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGIH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MGIH | 100% | N/A | ||
OI - MGIH | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
AMBP - MGIH | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
BALL - MGIH | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
REYN - MGIH | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
AVY - MGIH | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
More |