AMBZ
Price
$53.89
Change
+$0.95 (+1.79%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
483.3M
BCTF
Price
$12.43
Change
+$0.02 (+0.16%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
82.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBZ vs BCTF

Header iconAMBZ vs BCTF Comparison
Open Charts AMBZ vs BCTFBanner chart's image
American Business Bank (Los Angeles, CA)
Price$53.89
Change+$0.95 (+1.79%)
Volume$400
Capitalization483.3M
Bancorp 34
Price$12.43
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
Volume$200
Capitalization82.85M
AMBZ vs BCTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBZ vs. BCTF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBZ is a Buy and BCTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBZ: $53.89 vs. BCTF: $12.43)
Brand notoriety: AMBZ and BCTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBZ: 5% vs. BCTF: 4%
Market capitalization -- AMBZ: $483.3M vs. BCTF: $82.85M
AMBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $483.3M. BCTF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BCTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBZ is a better buy in the long-term than BCTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCTF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BCTF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCTF is a better buy in the short-term than AMBZ.

Price Growth

AMBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.79% price change this week, while BCTF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMBZ($483M) has a higher market cap than BCTF($82.9M). BCTF has higher P/E ratio than AMBZ: BCTF (14.29) vs AMBZ (11.87). AMBZ YTD gains are higher at: 24.530 vs. BCTF (5.161). BCTF has less debt than AMBZ: BCTF (32M) vs AMBZ (100M). AMBZ has higher revenues than BCTF: AMBZ (128M) vs BCTF (29.8M).
AMBZBCTFAMBZ / BCTF
Capitalization483M82.9M583%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.5305.161475%
P/E Ratio11.8714.2983%
Revenue128M29.8M430%
Total Cash112MN/A-
Total Debt100M32M313%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBZ vs BCTF: Fundamental Ratings
AMBZ
BCTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2471
SMR RATING
1..100
3583
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMBZ's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BCTF (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCTF (71) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCTF (83) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BCTF (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCTF (98) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBZBCTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFESX17.310.16
+0.93%
DFA Emerging Markets Social Core Port
FIAGX22.510.11
+0.49%
Fidelity Advisor International Growth A
CLTCX15.69N/A
N/A
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation C
TVFRX18.11N/A
N/A
NAA Allocation P
SVIFX9.49-0.04
-0.42%
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity C

AMBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBZ and SBSI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBZ and SBSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBZ
1D Price
Change %
AMBZ100%
+1.79%
SBSI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
CUBI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
FCF - AMBZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
SSB - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
FUNC - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More

BCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCTF and CBAF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCTF and CBAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCTF
1D Price
Change %
BCTF100%
+0.16%
CBAF - BCTF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLO - BCTF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
CFBK - BCTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
AMBZ - BCTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
LCNB - BCTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More