AMBZ
Price
$47.00
Change
+$1.56 (+3.43%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
295.01M
FUNC
Price
$33.81
Change
+$0.57 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBZ vs FUNC

Header iconAMBZ vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts AMBZ vs FUNCBanner chart's image
American Business Bank (Los Angeles, CA)
Price$47.00
Change+$1.56 (+3.43%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization295.01M
First United
Price$33.81
Change+$0.57 (+1.71%)
Volume$14.21K
Capitalization152.19M
AMBZ vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBZ vs. FUNC commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBZ is a Buy and FUNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBZ: $47.00 vs. FUNC: $33.81)
Brand notoriety: AMBZ and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBZ: 46% vs. FUNC: 38%
Market capitalization -- AMBZ: $295.01M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
AMBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $295.01M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBZ is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than AMBZ.

Price Growth

AMBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.25% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMBZ($295M) has a higher market cap than FUNC($152M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than AMBZ: FUNC (10.14) vs AMBZ (6.08). AMBZ YTD gains are higher at: 8.049 vs. FUNC (1.767). FUNC has less debt than AMBZ: FUNC (112M) vs AMBZ (486M). AMBZ has higher revenues than FUNC: AMBZ (137M) vs FUNC (71.3M).
AMBZFUNCAMBZ / FUNC
Capitalization295M152M194%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.0491.767456%
P/E Ratio6.0810.1460%
Revenue137M71.3M192%
Total CashN/A86.9M-
Total Debt486M112M434%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBZ vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
AMBZ
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
182
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3230
SMR RATING
1..100
2639
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1657
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (61) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (32) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (39) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (47) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBZFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAHTX6.81N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps C
HGOTX75.67N/A
N/A
Hartford Growth Opportunities R5
JDSCX32.79N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend I
TIHIX13.75N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Stock I2
VYMVX18.27N/A
N/A
Voya Mid Cap Research Enhanced Index R

AMBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBZ and SBSI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBZ and SBSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBZ
1D Price
Change %
AMBZ100%
+3.43%
SBSI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
CUBI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
FCF - AMBZ
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SSB - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
FUNC - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
More