AMBZ
Price
$47.60
Change
+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
295.01M
SSB
Price
$98.50
Change
+$0.60 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.48B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBZ vs SSB

Header iconAMBZ vs SSB Comparison
Open Charts AMBZ vs SSBBanner chart's image
American Business Bank (Los Angeles, CA)
Price$47.60
Change+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Volume$2.68K
Capitalization295.01M
SouthState
Price$98.50
Change+$0.60 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.02M
Capitalization6.48B
AMBZ vs SSB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBZ vs. SSB commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBZ is a StrongBuy and SSB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBZ: $47.60 vs. SSB: $98.50)
Brand notoriety: AMBZ and SSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBZ: 32% vs. SSB: 169%
Market capitalization -- AMBZ: $295.01M vs. SSB: $6.48B
AMBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $295.01M. SSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBZ is a better buy in the long-term than SSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SSB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSB is a better buy in the short-term than AMBZ.

Price Growth

AMBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.15% price change this week, while SSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

SSB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSB($6.48B) has a higher market cap than AMBZ($295M). SSB has higher P/E ratio than AMBZ: SSB (12.88) vs AMBZ (6.08). AMBZ YTD gains are higher at: 9.428 vs. SSB (0.116). SSB (482M) and AMBZ (486M) have identical debt. SSB has higher revenues than AMBZ: SSB (1.7B) vs AMBZ (137M).
AMBZSSBAMBZ / SSB
Capitalization295M6.48B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.4280.1168,139%
P/E Ratio6.0812.8847%
Revenue137M1.7B8%
Total CashN/A515M-
Total Debt486M482M101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBZ vs SSB: Fundamental Ratings
AMBZ
SSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
274
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3122
SMR RATING
1..100
2610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2462
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMBZ's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SSB (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to SSB’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (31) in the null industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (26) in the null industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SSB (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to SSB’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSB (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBZSSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAFGX46.840.18
+0.39%
American Funds AMCAP R6
EPLDX22.910.09
+0.39%
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class R6
DVLRX62.75N/A
N/A
Macquarie Small Cap Value R
ICVPX15.68N/A
N/A
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II S2
RRSRX30.18-0.06
-0.20%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs R6

AMBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBZ and SBSI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBZ and SBSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBZ
1D Price
Change %
AMBZ100%
+0.38%
SBSI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
CUBI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
FCF - AMBZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
SSB - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
FUNC - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More